Could a corporation skip earlier profitable years and save 2001-2002 Illinois net losses for deductions in 2006 and 2007?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ezel answers yours, under current Illinois tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The corporation could not choose to skip earlier profitable years and preserve its 2001 and 2002 Illinois losses for 2006 and 2007. Unless it timely and irrevocably elected to relinquish the entire carryback period, each loss first went to the two preceding years and then to each succeeding year in statutory order.
The remaining loss available in a later year was reduced by deductions allowable in every prior eligible year. That reduction applied even if the corporation did not actually claim the loss deduction on the return for the earlier year.
What this means for you
Build the loss schedule chronologically from the earliest carryback year. Do not measure the remaining carryover solely by deductions actually reported on filed returns.
Common questions
Q: Could the taxpayer elect carryforward-only treatment later?
A: No. The election had to be made by the loss-year return due date, including extensions, and was irrevocable.
Q: Did an unclaimed earlier deduction remain available for later use?
A: No. An amount allowable in the earlier year reduced the remaining loss even if it was not claimed.
Citations and references
- 35 ILCS 5/207(a)(2), (a-5)(A), (a-5)(B)
Subject
Net Operating Loss And Net Operating Loss Deduction
Source
- Landing page: https://taxarchive.illinois.gov/research/legal/letter-rulings/income-tax/2010.html
- Original PDF: https://tax.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/taxarchive/research/legal/letter-rulings/income-tax/2010/ig100001.pdf
Original ruling text
IT 10-0001-GIL 01/04/2010 NET OPERATING LOSS AND NET OPERATING LOSS DEDUCTION
General Information Letter: Unless a timely election is made to carry losses forward
only, an Illinois net lo0ss incurred in a taxable year for which carrybacks are allowed
must first be carried back.
January 4, 2010
Dear:
This is in response to your letter dated November 25, 2009. The nature of your letter and the
information provided require that we respond with a General Information Letter (GIL). A GIL is
designed to provide general information, is not a statement of Department policy and is not binding on
the Department. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.120(b) and (c), which may be accessed from the
Department’s web site at www.ILtax.com.
Your letter states as follows:
This letter and the attached documentation is in response to the enclosed notice and letters
dated October 29, 2009 and corrected Schedules NLD relating to COMPANY, Inc.
(“COMPANY”). As explained in the attached letters and corrected schedules NLD for the
December 2006 and December 2007 reporting periods, the Illinois Department of Revenue
has reduced Illinois net loss deductions previously claimed on COMPANY’s tax returns for
these periods to $50,932 and $0, respectively. Their explanation for these reductions is
because losses are required to be carried to the first income filings and even though losses
were not used by COMPANY on the 2003, 2004, and 2005 original return filings, they should
have been and are therefore no longer available for use in subsequent years.
Based on a telephone conversation that I had with Ms. Z at the Illinois Department of Revenue
today, she explained to me that I could request a statutory ruling from your office on the
Department of Revenue’s position for reducing the Illinois net loss deductions available for the
2006 and 2007 tax years.
As additional background, I have attached the following information to support the Illinois net
loss deductions claimed by COMPANY on the 2006 and 2007 Illinois Corporation Income and
Replacement Tax Returns (Forms IL-1120) for the calendar years ended 12/31/2006 and
12/31/2007:
- A copy of the Taxpayer Statement, letters, and corrected Schedules NLD for COMPANY
dated October 29, 2009 are attached for your reference. (5 pages). - A spreadsheet summarizing the Illinois base income / (Loss) for the December 31, 2001
through December 31, 2007 calendar years and related Illinois Net Operating Loss (NOL)
deductions as previously reported on the Illinois Corporation Income and Replacement Tax
Returns for COMPANY. (1 page). - Copies of the previously filed Forms IL-1120 for the calendar year ending 12/31/2001,
12/31/2003, 12/31/2004 and 12/31/2005 for COMPANY from our records. (11 pages). Because
we do not have a copy of the previously filed Form IL-1120 for the calendar year ending
12/31/2002 in our records, we are relying on the Illinois Department of Revenue’s corrected
Illinois net loss amount of $55,698, as shown on the enclosed corrected Schedules NLD
provided under item 1 above.
IT 10-0001-GIL
January 4, 2010
Page 2
- As referenced in opening paragraph of this letter, the enclosed previously filed Forms IL1120 for the 12/31/2003, 12/31/2004, and 12/31/2005 calendar years did not include Illinois net
loss deductions and included income and replacement tax liabilities, which were presumably
previously paid by COMPANY.
35 ILCS 5/207(a)(2) and IL Admin. Code 100.2330(b)(1) both provide that an Illinois net loss
that is incurred in a tax year ending on or after December 31, 1999 and prior to December 31,
2003 may be carried back to the two preceding tax years or carried forward to the 20
succeeding tax years. Because the Illinois net losses in question were incurred in the 2001 and
2002 tax years, those provisions clearly apply to the Illinois net losses for COMPANY.
Furthermore, because these statutory provisions do not specifically address the implications of
Illinois net loss deductions not being carried to the next available tax year(s) by a taxpayer and
because these provision do specifically allow for Illinois net losses for the tax years in question
to be carried forward to the 20 succeeding tax years, the previously unused Illinois net losses
from the 2001 and 2002 tax years were carried to the 2006 and 2007 tax years for COMPANY.
As such, we respectfully request a ruling from the Legal Services Division on this matter,
including any statutory references, case law citations, or other administrative rulings which
may support the position taken by the Illinois Department of Revenue in the enclosed
Taxpayer Statement and letters. If such a statute or ruling that addresses this specific fact
patter does not exist, then we request that consideration be given to COMPANY’s 2006 and
2007 tax return filing positions in light of the fact that the Illinois losses incurred by COMPANY
in 2001 and 2002 and deducted on the 2006 and 2007 tax returns are within the allowable 20
year carryforward period and were not previously claimed as deductions by COMPANY.
RULING
Section 207 of the Illinois Income Tax Act (“IITA” ; 35 ILCS 5/207) states in part:
(a) If after applying all of the (i) modifications provided for in paragraph (2) of Section 203(b),
paragraph (2) of Section 203(c) and paragraph (2) of Section 203(d) and (ii) the allocation and
apportionment provisions of Article 3 of this Act and subsection (c) of this Section, the
taxpayer’s net income results in a loss;
(1) …
(2) for any taxable year ending on or after December 31, 1999 and prior to December 31,
2003, such loss shall be allowed as a carryback to each of the 2 taxable years preceding the
taxable year of such loss and shall be a net operating loss carryover to each of the 20 taxable
years following the taxable year of such loss.
(a-5) Election to relinquish carryback and order of application of losses.
(A) For losses incurred in tax years ending prior to December 31, 2003, the taxpayer may
elect to relinquish the entire carryback period with respect to such loss. Such election shall be
made in the form and manner prescribed by the Department and shall be made by the due
date (including extensions of time) for filing the taxpayer’s return for the taxable year in which
IT 10-0001-GIL
January 4, 2010
Page 3
such loss is incurred, and such election, once made, shall be irrevocable.
(B) The entire amount of such loss shall be carried to the earliest taxable year to which such
loss may be carried. The amount of such loss which shall be carried to each of the other
taxable years shall be the excess, if any, of the amount of such loss over the sum of the
deductions for carryback or carryover of such loss allowable for each of the prior taxable years
to which such loss may be carried.
Under this section, except to the extent provided in subsection (a-5)(A), a taxpayer may not elect the
taxable years to which an Illinois net operating loss may be carried. In this case, unless COMPANY
made the election under subsection (a-5)(A), the 2001 and 2002 Illinois net operating losses must
each be carried back to the two taxable years preceding the loss year, and then carried forward to
each of the 20 taxable years following the loss year. Under the ordering rule in subsection (a-5)(B),
the amount of loss that may be carried to a taxable year is the excess of the amount of such loss over
the sum of the deductions for carryback or carryover of such loss allowable for each of the preceding
taxable years to which such loss may be carried. The amount of Illinois net loss deduction allowable
for each prior taxable year under this rule does not depend on whether or not the taxpayer actually
filed a return in the prior taxable year claiming the deduction.
Accordingly, the amount of COMPANY’s 2001 loss that may be carried to 2006 and 2007 is the
excess of such loss over the sum of the deductions for carryback or carryover of such loss allowable
for COMPANY’s 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004, and 2005 taxable years, regardless of whether any of its
2001 loss was actually claimed as a deduction in these prior years. Similarly, the amount of
COMPANY’s 2002 loss that may be carried to 2006 and 2007 is the excess of such loss over the sum
of the deductions for carryback or carryover of such loss allowable for COMPANY’s 2000, 2003,
2004, and 2005 taxable years, regardless of whether any of its 2002 loss was actually claimed as a
deduction in these prior years.
As stated above, this is a GIL. A GIL does not constitute a statement of policy that applies, interprets
or prescribes the tax laws, and it is not binding on the Department.
Sincerely,
Brian L. Stocker
Associate Counsel (Income Tax)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2010 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Illinois tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.