🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
GA LR SUT-2019-07 Sales and Use Tax 2019-09-25

Does a Georgia electric-vehicle charging-station operator collect sales tax when it bills drivers by charging time or by kilowatt-hour?

Short answer: Time-based EV charging was not a taxable retail sale of electricity, so the operator did not collect sales tax from drivers and instead owed tax on property it consumed in providing the service. If properly authorized to buy electricity for resale and bill by kilowatt-hour, the operator would make taxable electricity sales and tax the related sale charges.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2019. Ezel answers yours, under current Georgia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2019
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Letter Ruling of the Georgia Department of Revenue. It is binding on the Department only with respect to the taxpayer who requested it and the specific facts presented, and it may be superseded by a later change in statute, regulation, or Department policy; no other taxpayer may rely on it. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Georgia tax professional about your situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The electric-vehicle charging operator billed customers for charging time, plus a session fee and possible idling charges. It did not sell electricity by kilowatt-hour and did not claim a resale exemption when buying electricity from the utility.

The Georgia Department of Revenue ruled that this time-based model was a service, not a retail sale of electricity. The customer charges were therefore not subject to sales tax. As the service provider, however, the operator was the consumer of the electricity and other tangible property used in providing the service and owed sales or use tax on those purchases.

The result would change if the operator obtained the required regulatory authority, bought electricity tax-free for resale, and charged customers by kilowatt-hour. Electricity is tangible personal property under Georgia law, so those kWh charges and other charges necessary to complete the sale would be taxable unless a specific exemption applied.

What this means for you

EV-charging operators

The billing model matters. Under this ruling, charging for access or time was treated as a service, while charging by measured kilowatt-hours would be a retail electricity sale. A switch in pricing can change both customer tax collection and how the operator buys electricity.

Parking and property operators

If EV charging is offered as a time-based service, the provider may owe tax on the electricity and equipment it consumes rather than charging sales tax on the driver's fee. The ruling's result depended on the operator not being authorized or treated as a retail electric supplier.

Accountants and tax professionals

For a time-based model, treat the operator as the consumer of inputs. For an authorized kWh resale model, the operator may purchase electricity for resale but must collect tax on the retail electricity charge and other charges necessary to complete that sale.

Common questions

Q: Is time-based EV charging subject to Georgia sales tax?
A: No on the facts in this ruling. The Department did not treat the operator as making retail sales of electricity when it charged customers for time.

Q: Who pays tax on the electricity in the time-based model?
A: The charging operator. As a service provider, it is the consumer of tangible personal property used in providing the service.

Q: What if the operator charges by kilowatt-hour?
A: If it is legally authorized to sell electricity and buys it for resale, the kWh charge is a taxable retail sale of electricity, along with other charges necessary to complete the sale.

Q: Does the ruling provide electric-utility regulatory approval?
A: No. It assumes the operator would obtain the required Public Service Commission and territorial-service approvals before selling electricity by kWh.

Q: Can another charging operator rely on this ruling?
A: No. The ruling is limited to the requesting taxpayer and facts, including the billing method and regulatory status.

Citations and references

Statutes and rules:

  • O.C.G.A. §§ 48-8-1 and 48-8-30 (sales and use tax imposition)
  • O.C.G.A. §§ 48-8-2(31) and (37) (retail sale and electricity as tangible personal property)
  • O.C.G.A. § 46-2-70(3) (definition of utility)
  • O.C.G.A. § 46-2-7(4) (Public Service Commission jurisdiction)
  • O.C.G.A. § 46-3-3(3) (electric supplier)
  • O.C.G.A. §§ 46-3-1 through 46-3-15 (Georgia Territorial Electric Service Act)
  • Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 560-12-1-.14(7)(d) (service providers as consumers)

Source

Original ruling text

Georgia Letter Ruling: LR SUT-2019-07
Topic: Retail Sale; Car Charging Stations
Date Issued: September 25, 2019
This letter is in response to your request for guidance on the application of Georgia sales and use tax to certain
transactions entered into by “Taxpayer” in the state of Georgia.
Facts Presented by Taxpayer
Taxpayer owns and operates electric vehicle charging stations in Georgia. Customers pay for charging time, plus a
$____ session fee. Additional charges apply for “idling”, which is leaving the vehicle connected to the charger after
the charge is complete (not including a specified grace period). The service is not sold by kilowatt-hour (kWh) at this
time. Currently, no resale exemptions are being taken by Taxpayer on its purchases of electricity from the utility
company.
In the future, subject to utility regulatory approval, Taxpayer may begin to charge by kWh instead of charging for
time.
Issues
1.

What is the appropriate sales and use tax treatment for Taxpayer’s current transactions where Taxpayer charges
customers at charging stations for time?

2.

What is the appropriate sales and use tax treatment for transactions where Taxpayer charges customers by kWh
(assuming Taxpayer properly obtains all regulatory approval to charge by kWh)?

Analysis
Georgia levies and imposes a tax (subject to certain exemptions) on the retail purchase, retail sale, rental, storage, use,
or consumption of tangible personal property and on certain enumerated services. 1 A “retail sale” is any sale, lease,
or rental for any purpose other than for resale, sublease, or subrent. 2 “’Tangible personal property’ means personal
property that can be seen, weighed, measured, felt, or touched or that is in any other manner perceptible to the senses.
Tangible personal property includes electricity, water, gas, steam, and prewritten computer software.” 3
Charges for time vs. charges for electricity
In Georgia, a “utility” is defined as “any person who supplies, furnishes or sells a natural gas or electric service.” 4
Anyone that provides a utility service is subject the jurisdiction of the Georgia Public Service Commission (“PSC”). 5
More particularly, an electric supplier is defined to be within the PSC’s jurisdiction. 6 Therefore if Taxpayer is “selling”
electricity it would be subject to the jurisdiction of the PSC. If Taxpayer is “selling” electricity, it would be required
to obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the PSC prior to constructing, selling, or increasing
or decreasing the capacity of a supply-side option. Further, the Georgia Territorial Electric Service Act, O.C.G.A. §§
46-3-1 through 15, designates exclusive territories to utilities that furnish electricity at retail. Once a territory has been
assigned to a utility, there are only limited exceptions that would allow another utility to sell within the territory.
Based on the above, Taxpayer’s current activity does not constitute “selling” electricity such that Taxpayer falls within
the jurisdiction of the PSC. Therefore, Taxpayer does not sell electricity at retail and Taxpayer’s charges for are not
subject to the tax.

O.C.G.A. §§ 48-8-1 and 48-8-30.
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-2(31).
3
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-2(37).
4
O.C.G.A. § 46-2-70(3).
5
O.C.G.A. § 46-2-7-(4).
6
O.C.G.A. § 46-3-3(3).
1
2

Georgia Letter Ruling: LR SUT-2019-07
Topic: Retail Sale; Car Charging Stations
Date Issued: September 25, 2019
Page 2 of 2
Were Taxpayer to comply with the relevant requirements and become subject to PSC jurisdiction and obtain the
necessary certification to sell electricity, Taxpayer may purchase electricity tax-free for resale and make taxable retail
sales of electricity. Such retail sales of electricity would be subject to sales tax (unless a specific exemption apllies).
Service providers
Service providers are deemed to be the consumers of tangible personal property used or consumed during the provision
of a service. 7 Under its current practice of billing by time, Taxpayer is effectively a service provider and is liable (like
any other purchaser at retail) for sales and use tax on all retail purchases of tangible personal property it purchases to
be used and/or consumed in the provision of its service.
Rulings
1.

The Department does not consider Taxpayer to be making retail sales of electricity, and thus its charges for time
are not subject to the tax. Taxpayer is liable for sales and use tax on all tangible personal property it purchases at
retail for use and consumption in the provision of its service.

2.

If Taxpayer were to legally and properly purchase electricity tax-free for resale and then charge retail customers
by kWh for that electricity, such charges by kWh (and any other charges necessary to complete the sale) would
be subject to the tax.

The opinions expressed in this ruling are based upon the information contained in your request and limited to the
specific transactions, facts, circumstances and taxpayer in question. The facts herein are those presented by the
taxpayer and the Department accepts them as true for this ruling. If the facts presented herein change, are not true, are
different, or material facts have been omitted, the conclusions reached in this ruling may change. In addition,
subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this
advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different tax treatment than that expressed in this ruling.

7

Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 560-12-1-.14(7)(d).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2019 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Georgia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.