🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
GA LR SUT-2013-05 Sales and Use Tax 2013-06-13

May a Georgia seller limit direct customer sales-tax refunds to 90 days and require later exemption claims to be filed with the state?

Short answer: Yes. The seller could require full invoice payment, review late exemption certificates, refund or adjust tax for requests within 90 days, and direct later claims to the Department with the seller's cooperation. The Department said these procedures were permissible but did not endorse them; the refund terms were a matter of private contract with customers.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ezel answers yours, under current Georgia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2013
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Letter Ruling of the Georgia Department of Revenue. It is binding on the Department only with respect to the taxpayer who requested it and the specific facts presented, and it may be superseded by a later change in statute, regulation, or Department policy; no other taxpayer may rely on it. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Georgia tax professional about your situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The company's proposed process was permissible. It could require customers to pay invoices in full when no exemption certificate was supplied at sale, then review a later certificate and refund or adjust tax for a request made within 90 days. For requests after that contractual window, it could help the customer prepare a refund claim for direct Department review.

The Department did not endorse the 90-day cutoff or any particular dealer procedure. It treated those refund terms as a private contractual matter between seller and customer. The seller still needed an appropriate, complete, applicable, and reasonable exemption certificate accepted under the statutory rules.

Common questions

Q: Did Georgia law itself impose the seller's 90-day refund cutoff?

A: No. The Department described that cutoff as part of the company's private customer terms.

Q: Could a seller adjust a later return after refunding valid tax?

A: The proposed and approved procedure included processing the customer refund and adjusting the company's next return.

Citations and references

  • O.C.G.A. § 48-8-38(a)-(g) -- seller proof and exemption certificates
  • O.C.G.A. §§ 48-8-30(b)(1), 48-8-35 -- dealer collection liability

Source

Original ruling text

State of Georgia
Douglas J. MacGinnitie
Commissioner

Department of Revenue

Administrative Division – Office of Tax Policy
1800 Century Blvd., Suite 15107
Atlanta, Georgia 30345-3205
(404) 417- 6649

Frank M. O’Connell
Director

June 13, 2013

Georgia Letter Ruling No. 2013-06-13-03 Refunds & Exemption Documentation

This letter is in response to your request for Georgia sales and use tax guidance.
Facts
The Company and its affiliates bill its customers for all applicable costs and taxes at the time of sale.
There are times when the costumer does not tell the Company that the customer is exempt and does
not provide exemption documentation at the time of the sale. At times, the customers will short pay
the invoice by the amount of the taxes and provide the Company with the appropriate exemption
certificate. Other times, customers will provide an exemption certificate and request a refund of all
applicable taxes. The Company’s current procedure is to verify the accuracy of the certificate for the
relevant period and refund tax to the customer (if the invoice was paid in full) or offset the refund
against the Company current sales tax liability in the case where the Company has already remitted
the tax to the state and the customer short-paid the invoice.
The Company proposes the following procedures:
(1) Limit the time period of all tax refunds to 90 days from the date of the invoice.
(2) If the customer fails to provide a certificate at the time of purchase, the customer is required to
pay the invoice in full.
(3) If, after making the purchase, the customer provides the Company with an exemption certificate,
the Company will review the certificate to ensure the certificate is applicable for the time period and
process the appropriate tax refund to the customer and make an adjustment on the Company’s next
sales tax return.
(4) For requests after 90 days from the date of the invoice, the customer will work with the Company
to complete the necessary refund claim forms for the state to review, and the customer will file the
refund claim with the state.

An Equal Opportunity Employer

June 13, 2013
Page 2 of 3

Issue
Do the sales tax refund procedures outlined above comply with Georgia law?
Analysis
Georgia levies and imposes a tax (subject to certain specific exemptions) on the retail purchase, retail
sale, storage, use, or consumption of tangible personal property and on certain enumerated services. 1
Every purchaser of tangible personal property at retail in Georgia is liable for a tax on the purchase at
the rate of 4 percent of the sales price of the purchase, plus any applicable local sales taxes. The
dealer making the taxable sale must collect the tax from the purchaser and remit the tax to the
Department. 2 Any dealer who neglects, fails, or refuses to collect the tax upon a retail sale of tangible
personal property made by him, his agent, or his employee when the sale is subject to the tax shall be
liable for and shall pay the tax himself. 3
All gross sales of a retailer are subject to the tax until the contrary is established. The burden of
proving that a sale of tangible personal property is not a sale at retail is on the person who makes the
sale unless such person takes from the purchaser a certificate stating that the property is purchased
for resale or is otherwise exempt. 4 For transactions occurring between January 1, 2011 and March 4,
2013, the certificate relieves the seller from the burden of proof (mentioned above) if the seller
acquires from the purchaser a properly completed certificate. 5 The Department of Revenue
(“Department”) must relieve a seller of the tax otherwise applicable if the seller obtains a fully
completed exemption certificate approved by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board, the
Department, or the Multistate Tax Commission or captures the relevant data elements required under
the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement within 90 days subsequent to the date of sale. 6 If the
seller has not obtained a fully completed exemption certificate or all relevant data elements required
under the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement within 90 days subsequent to the date of sale,
the Department must provide the seller with 120 days subsequent to a request for substantiation to
either:
(1) Obtain a fully completed exemption certificate from the purchaser, taken in good faith
which means that the seller obtain a certificate that claims an exemption that:
(A) Was statutorily available on the date of the transaction in the jurisdiction where
the transaction is sourced;
(B) Could be applicable to the item being purchased; and
(C) Is reasonable for the purchaser's type of business; or
(2) Obtain other information establishing that the transaction was not subject to the tax. 7

1

O.C.G.A. §§ 48-8-1 and 48-8-30(a).
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-30(b)(1).
3
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-35.
4
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-38(a).
5
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-38(b).
6
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-38(f).
7
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-38(f).
2

June 13, 2013
Page 3 of 3

The Department must relieve a seller of the tax otherwise applicable if the seller obtains a blanket
exemption certificate from a purchaser with which the seller has a recurring business relationship. 8
Effective March 5, 2013, the burden of proving that a sale of tangible personal property is not a sale
at retail shall be upon the seller unless the seller, in good faith, takes from the purchaser a properly
completed exemption certificate stating that the property is purchased for resale or is otherwise tax
exempt. A properly completed certificate taken in good faith means that the seller must obtain a
certificate:
(1) That is fully completed, including, but not limited to, the name, address, sales tax
number, and signature of the taxpayer when required;
(2) In a form appropriate for the type of exemption claimed;
(3) Claiming an exemption that was statutorily available on the date of the transaction
in the jurisdiction where the transaction is sourced;
(4) Claiming an exemption that could be applicable to the item being purchased; and
(5) Claiming an exemption that is reasonable for the purchaser's type of business.
With respect to sales for resale, the certificate relieves the seller from the burden of proof if the seller
acquires from the purchaser a properly completed certificate, taken in good faith, from a purchaser
who:
(1) Is engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property;
(2) Has a valid sales tax registration number at the time of purchase and has listed his
or her sales tax number on the certificate; and
(3) At the time of purchasing the tangible personal property, the seller has no reason
to believe that the purchaser does not intend to resell it in his or her regular course of
business.
Ruling
The procedures outlined above are permissible under Georgia sales tax law. However, the
Department of Revenue does not endorse any particular refund procedures to which a dealer and the
dealer’s customer agree. The refund terms and procedures that the Company chooses to put in place
are a matter of private contract between the Company and its customers.
The opinions expressed in this ruling are based upon the information contained in your request and
limited to the specific transactions and taxpayer in question. Should the circumstances regarding the
transactions change, or differ materially from those represented, then this ruling may become invalid.
In addition, please be advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial
interpretations of the Statutes or Rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future
transactions to a different tax treatment than that expressed in this response.

8

O.C.G.A. § 48-8-38(g).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2013 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Georgia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.