🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
CT Ruling 91-7 Sales and Use Taxes 1991-04-02

May a Connecticut manufacturer buy air compressors tax-free when they eject parts from dies, sandblast finished products, and also power production machinery?

Short answer: Yes, assuming the company qualified as a manufacturer. A compressor used to blow a part from a die and two compressors used primarily to sandblast parts in the final finishing stage qualified as machinery used directly in manufacturing under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-412(34) and the cited regulations. The two sandblasting compressors' additional use about 40% of the time to power production-line machines did not defeat the exemption because their direct manufacturing uses affected the finished product.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ezel answers yours, under current Connecticut tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Ruling of the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services (DRS), typically issued to a specific taxpayer in response to that taxpayer's request and based on the specific facts presented and the Connecticut tax law in effect when it was issued. DRS may later declare a Ruling obsolete or supersede it by a subsequent Ruling, Policy Statement, or Announcement, so a taxpayer with different facts should not assume it still applies. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. Connecticut imposes its sales and use tax solely at the state level: there are no local or municipal sales taxes. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Connecticut tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A manufacturer used three air compressors in its production process. One compressor blew a manufactured part out of a die so workers did not have to handle it before the next stage. Two others primarily powered sandblasting, blowing beads onto parts during the final finishing stage. Those two also powered other production-line machines about 40% of the time.

DRS ruled that all three compressors qualified for the manufacturing exemption under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-412(34) and Conn. Agencies Regs. §§ 12-412-11b(a)(9) and (11), assuming the company otherwise qualified as a manufacturer. The die-ejection and sandblasting functions were direct uses in the manufacturing production process and had a direct effect on the finished product to be sold.

The fact that two compressors also powered machinery -- an indirect manufacturing use -- did not destroy their exempt status because they were used directly for the qualifying sandblasting work.

What this means for you

Document each compressor's production function

The favorable result rested on specific direct uses: moving a part from a die and applying the final sandblasted finish.

Mixed direct and indirect use did not automatically disqualify the equipment

The sandblasting compressors remained exempt even though they spent about 40% of their time powering other production machinery.

Manufacturer status was assumed

The ruling expressly conditioned its answer on the company qualifying as a manufacturer. It did not decide that threshold issue.

Common questions

Was the die-ejection compressor exempt? Yes. DRS treated blowing the part from the die as direct use in manufacturing.

Were the sandblasting compressors exempt? Yes. Sandblasting was part of the final production stage and directly affected the finished product.

Did the 40% machinery-powering use make them taxable? No. The ruling said the indirect use did not affect exempt status when the compressors also had qualifying direct manufacturing uses.

Citations and references

  • Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-412(34) -- manufacturing machinery exemption applied by the ruling.
  • Conn. Agencies Regs. §§ 12-412-11b(a)(9) and (11) -- direct-use provisions cited by DRS.

Source

Original ruling text

Ruling 91-7, Manufacturing / Air Compressors

Ruling 91-7

Manufacturing Air Compressors

FACTS:

Company purchases air compressors which serve various purposes in its manufacturing production process. One compressor is used solely to blow a part out of a die so that the part is not required to be handled in order to move it to the next production stage. The compressor is not used for any other process.

Two other air compressors are used primarily for sandblasting by blowing beads onto a part for the final finishing stage of production. Incidental to this use is that these two compressors are used for a portion of the time (approximately 40%) to power machines on the production line.

ISSUE:

Whether air compressors may be purchased exempt from sales tax when they are to be used directly in the manufacturing production process.

RULING:

Assuming that Company qualifies as a manufacturer, its use of the air compressors described herein qualifies for an exemption from sales and use taxes as machinery used directly in the manufacturing production process pursuant to Section 12-412(34) of the Connecticut General Statutes and Sections 12-412-11b(a)(9) and (11) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies. Under these circumstances, the compressors have a direct effect on the finished product to be sold.

When an air compressor is used directly in the manufacturing production process, such as the die blowing and sandblasting described herein, the fact that the air compressor also powers machinery (i.e. is used indirectly in the manufacturing production process) does not affect its tax exempt status.

LEGAL DIVISION

April 2, 1991

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1991 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Connecticut tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.