How did Connecticut Ruling 89-60 tax plan reviews, property inspections, and construction management services?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours, under current Connecticut tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The ruling classified plan reviews, property inspections, and construction management services according to the property and how the work related to architectural or engineering services.
Plan reviews and inspections of new-building construction for lenders, performed to check compliance with construction documents, were not taxable. Inspections of existing exclusively residential, owner-occupied one-, two-, or three-family homes were also not taxable. Inspections of existing commercial, industrial, or income-producing real property were taxable.
Construction management for new construction and for existing exclusively residential, owner-occupied one-, two-, or three-family homes was not taxable. Construction management for existing commercial, industrial, or income-producing property was taxable.
Property inspections, plan reviews, and construction management were taxable when performed as an integral part of architectural or building-engineering services.
The official archive says this ruling was obsoleted in part by Announcements 94(3) and 94(4).
What this means for you
Under the historical ruling, the same general service could receive different treatment based on the property and whether it was an integral part of a broader architectural or building-engineering service. Because the ruling is partly obsolete, current classifications must be verified separately.
Common questions
Were plan reviews for new construction taxable? No, when performed for lending institutions to verify compliance with construction documents.
Were inspections of existing commercial property taxable? Yes.
Were construction-management services always exempt? No. Services for existing commercial, industrial, or income-producing property were taxable.
What if the work was integral to architectural or building-engineering services? It was taxable under this ruling.
Citations and references
- No statute or regulation was cited in the ruling text.
Source
- Landing page: Connecticut DRS Rulings
- Ruling: Ruling 89-60
Original ruling text
Ruling 89-60, Engineering
Ruling 89-60
Engineering
This Ruling has been obsoleted in part by AN 94(3) ; obsoleted in part by AN 94(4)
Plan reviews and property inspections rendered to the construction of new buildings for lending institutions to ensure that the building complies with the construction documents are not taxable. Inspection services provided to existing one, two or three family, exclusively residential owner-occupied homes are not taxable. Inspection services provided to existing commercial, industrial or income-producing real property are subject to the sales and use tax.
Construction management services rendered to new construction or existing one, two or three family, exclusively residential owner-occupied homes are not taxable. Construction management services provided to existing commercial, industrial or income-producing property are subject to the sales and use tax.
Property inspections, plan reviews and/or construction management services that are performed as an integral part of an architectural service or building engineering services are taxable.
LEGAL DIVISION
August 22, 1989
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1989 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Connecticut tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.