🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
CT Ruling 89-190 Sales and Use Taxes 1989-11-06

When did initial commercial finish-out count as nontaxable new construction rather than taxable renovation under Connecticut Ruling 89-190?

Short answer: Initial finish-out of a new building, new addition, or first-sold office-condominium unit was nontaxable new construction. Work after initial finish-out—including changes for a new tenant in previously occupied space or rebuilding a previously owned unit—was taxable renovation.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours, under current Connecticut tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official 1989 Connecticut Department of Revenue Services Ruling applying the new-construction and renovation classifications then in effect. Its four outcomes depended on whether work was the initial finish-out of a new building or addition, whether space had been occupied, and whether an office-condominium unit had been previously owned. Connecticut imposes sales and use tax solely at the state level: there are no local or municipal sales taxes. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Connecticut tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

DRS defined new construction as a new building, a new addition, and the initial interior or exterior finish-out of either. Renovation meant making over or rebuilding an existing building, including finish-out after the initial finish-out even if the affected space had never been occupied.

Initial finish-out of unoccupied leased space in a new commercial building was nontaxable new construction. Initial finish-out of a newly sold office-condominium unit was also nontaxable.

Moving walls, changing wiring and plumbing, and changing windows and doors for a new tenant in previously occupied industrial space was taxable renovation. Gutting and rebuilding a previously owned office-condominium unit for a new owner was also taxable renovation.

What this means for you

The historical distinction turned on construction history, not just whether the current tenant or owner was new. Work after initial finish-out was renovation even when a particular space had not previously been occupied.

Common questions

Was initial finish-out of a new commercial building taxable? No under the ruling.

Was initial finish-out of a newly sold office-condominium unit taxable? No.

Were alterations for a new tenant in previously occupied space taxable? Yes.

Was gutting and rebuilding a previously owned office-condominium unit taxable? Yes.

Citations and references

  • The published ruling text does not cite a specific statute or regulation.

Source

Original ruling text

Ruling 89-190, Renovations

Ruling 89-190

Renovations

In your letter of July 27, 1989, you request advice concerning the taxability of services performed by your company in connection with new construction or with renovation of commercial buildings.

In the Department's view, new construction means the construction of new buildings or the construction of new additions to existing buildings, and includes the initial finish-out work to the interior or exterior of a new building (or new addition to an existing building).

In the Department's view, renovation means the making over or rebuilding of an existing building, and includes finish-out work performed after the initial finish-out work has been done, even if the affected portion of a building has not been previously occupied.

In Situation A, a new commercial building is built for ABC Company by your company. The interior space has not been previously occupied and is to be leased for the first time to a tenant or tenants. ABC Company hires your company to perform the initial finish-out work. Your company's services involved in the initial finish-out work to the leased space would be treated as services involved in new construction and would not be subject to sales and use taxes.

In Situation B, an office condominium development is built for a condominium developer by your company. The common areas have been completed, but the other interior space is to be sold for the first time to unit owners. A unit owner hires your company to perform the initial finish-out work. Your company's services involved in the initial finish-out work to the unit would be treated as services involved in new construction and would not be subject to sales and use taxes.

In Situation C, a new tenant leases previously occupied space in an industrial building. The new tenant hires your company to move walls, change wiring and plumbing and change some windows and doors. Your company's services involved in the work performed for the new tenant would be treated as services involved in renovation and would be subject to sales and use taxes.

In Situation D, a previously owned office condominium unit is acquired. The new unit owner hires your company to gut the unit to the bare walls and rebuild to suit its needs. Your company's services involved in the work performed for the new owner would be treated as services involved in renovation and would be subject to sales and use taxes.

LEGAL DIVISION

November 6, 1989

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1989 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Connecticut tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.