How were product-marketing strategy, packaging design, subcontracted design, and out-of-state design services taxed under Connecticut Ruling 89-180?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours, under current Connecticut tax law, with citations.
Note -- changed historical guidance. DRS marks this information "not current," states that Ruling 93-13 superseded it in part, and states that Announcement (AN) 94(4) obsoleted it.
Plain-English summary
Strategy ideas and design for new products were treated as product marketing, and gross receipts from that marketing were exempt. Packaging and delivery-system design were taxable as business analysis and management services.
Design services from a small design company to a large design company were taxable unless a valid resale certificate applied. Services for a large design company outside Connecticut were not taxable when sole benefit and use occurred outside the state. A resale certificate could be used when the large company resold the designs without alteration or modification.
What this means for you
The historical ruling separated product marketing from packaging design and conditioned resale and out-of-state treatment on specific facts. Later DRS guidance changed it.
Common questions
Were new-product strategy and design taxable? No under the ruling.
Were packaging and delivery-system designs taxable? Yes.
Could subcontracted design be bought for resale? Yes, when resold without alteration or modification.
Could design for an out-of-state company be nontaxable? Yes, when sole benefit and use occurred outside Connecticut.
Citations and references
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(2)(i)(J), as cited in the ruling.
- Public Act No. 89-251, as cited in the ruling.
- Ruling 93-13 -- identified by DRS as partly superseding this ruling.
- Announcement (AN) 94(4) -- identified by DRS as obsoleting this ruling.
Source
- Landing page: Connecticut DRS Rulings
- Ruling: Ruling 89-180
Original ruling text
Ruling 89-180, Marketing
This information is not current and is being provided for reference purposes only
Ruling 89-180
Marketing
This Ruling has been superseded in part by Ruling 93-13, obsoleted by AN 94(4)
The services that involve providing strategy ideas and design for new products are related to the marketing of products. The gross receipts for the marketing of products are exempt from sales and use tax.
The total sales price for packaging and delivery system designs are subject to sales and use tax as business analysis and management services pursuant to section 12-407(2)(i)(J) of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended by Public Act No. 89-251.
The services rendered to a large design company a the small design company are subject to sales and use tax unless a valid resale certificate applies. The charge for the design services rendered by the small design company to the large design company located outside Connecticut is not subject to sales and use tax provided the sole benefit and use of the service inure outside Connecticut. A resale certificate may be issued if the large design company resells the designs without altering or modifying them.
LEGAL DIVISION
October 30, 1989
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1989 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Connecticut tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.