🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
NV Opinion Letter AO-2024-05 April 30, 2024 Active
Back to Nevada guidance

Foreman/general-foreman prevailing wage premium must match the CBA's base-rate-only calculation

Summary: A licensed contractor asked the Labor Commissioner to clarify the published prevailing wage rate for Laborers in the Clark Region, which was higher than the actual Local 872 collective bargaining agreement rate for Foremen and General Foremen. The Labor Commissioner confirmed the CBA's 10% Foreman/General Foreman premium applies only to the Base Rate (not Base Rate plus fringe benefits), and that the 2023 Prevailing Wage Survey's published language describing the premium was erroneous and would be corrected by Amendment 6. Matters to contractors and auditors calculating certified payroll for Laborers on Clark Region and Southern Nevada Rural Region public works projects.

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current Nevada labor law, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Nevada Office of the Labor Commissioner (OLC). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

STATE OF NEVADA
JOE LOMBARDO DR. KRISTOPHER SANCHEZ
Governor Director

                                                                                                                BRETT HARRIS, ESQ.
                                                                                                                 Labor Commissioner




                           DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY
                     OFFICE OF THE LABOR COMMISSIONER
                                                      April 30, 2024

Via US Mail and Email

All 5s Construction LLC
c/o Noah G. Allison
The Allison Law Firm
2260 Corporate Circle, Suite 490
Henderson, NV 89074

Re: Request for Advisory Opinion—Calculation of Collective Bargaining Agreement Wage
When Rate Prevails for Purposes of NRS 338

Dear Mr. Allison,

    Pursuant to Nevada Administrative Code ("NAC") Section 607.650, an Advisory Opinion

has been requested by you on behalf of All 5s Construction LLC ("All 5s") clarifying the prevailing
wage rate for Laborers for the Clark Region of Nevada from the 2023 Prevailing Wage Survey
Determination. Specifically, you correctly identify that the published prevailing wage rate, which
prevailed for the 2023 Clark Region for the classification of Laborer from the Local Laborers 872
collective bargaining agreement ("CBA"), is higher than the wage rate calculation for Laborers in
Local 872's CBA. This is because the October 1, 2023, published rate for Laborer in the Clark
County and Southern Nevada Rural Regions was calculated erroneously from the Local 872 CBA
and will be corrected imminently by Amendment 6—Laborer Wage—Clark County and Southern
Nevada Rural Region.

    As set forth in NAC 607.650, this Advisory Opinion is limited to the facts and

circumstances set forth in the request. This Advisory Opinion shall not apply to any pending
administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding and shall not be relied upon by any party, whether a
party at issue in the facts or not, in any future proceeding unrelated to the specific and unique facts
and circumstances set forth in the request.





    Carson City: 1818 E. College Parkway, Suite 102, Carson City, Nevada 89706 - Telephone (775) 684-1890 - Fax (775) 687-6409
          Las Vegas: 3340 W. Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 - Telephone (702) 486-2650 - Fax (702) 486-2660
                                       www.labor.nv.gov      [email protected]

Page 2

WHEN A COLLECTIVELY BARGAINED RATE PREVAILS, THE CALCULATIONS TO
DETERMINE PREVAILING WAGE RATES FOR VARIOUS GROUPS UNDER THE
CLASSIFICATION MUST BE IDENTICAL TO THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
AGREEMENT

   Your Advisory Opinion Request describes a situation wherein All 5s, a licensed Nevada

contractor, is subcontracted to work on a Public Works Project in Clark County, Nevada
employing Laborers on the Project. All5s is signatory to the Laborers Local 872 union. Per Local
872's CBA,

   pay scale [for Laborers] is broken down into hourly wage rates ("Base Rate") and
   hourly fringe benefit rates ("Fringe"). The union pay scale lists several Base Rates
   divided by worker classifications ("Groups"). There is one calculation for Fringe
   across all Groups. The employer pays the Base Rate to the worker directly and it
   pays the Fringe to various union trust funds directly.
          …
   If a worker is a Foreman, he/she earns ten percent per hour more than the highest
   Laborer base rate classification supervised…If a worker is a General Foreman,
   he/she earns a ten percent increase in Foreman's Base Rate.

    However, the 2023 Prevailing Wage Rates from the Clark County Region were published

with identical journeyman rates, but instructed contractors that the foreman rate be "10% per hour
above highest paid journeyman supervised" and a general foreman "10% per hour above the
highest paid foreman supervised." This language excluded the distinction from the CBA that the
10% increase in pay be calculated on the Base Rate, not the Base Rate and Fringe benefits. This is
an error in the Prevailing Wage Survey.

    In the examples provided in the Request for Advisory Opinion, the Auditor is correctly

calculating the Laborer rates as published in the 2023 Prevailing Wage Survey for the Clark Region,
but the published prevailing wage rates for foreman and general foreman are erroneously described.
The rates should be calculated and published consistent with All 5s position, but the Auditor,
without the benefit of the knowledge of the details of the CBA, performed calculations based on
the published language, which is incorrectly described.

    In sum, if a wage prevails for a classification of worker in a region in Nevada, the

calculations performed for purposes of complying with the CBA must result in the same
calculations and amounts as the published prevailing wage rates. Otherwise, the published
prevailing rates would reflect a wage rate that did not actually prevail. As such, the Office of the
Labor Commissioner is issuing Amendment 6 to the 2023 Prevailing Wage Survey for the Clark
and Southern Rural Regions in Nevada.

    Please be advised that this Advisory Opinion is limited to the specific facts and

circumstances described herein. The Office of the Labor Commissioner may revisit this issue
through the Administrative Rulemaking Process. Please be further advised that subsequent
statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretation of the statutes or rules upon which
any opinion is based may require modification or abandonment of this Advisory Opinion.

    Carson City: 1818 E. College Parkway, Suite 102, Carson City, Nevada 89706 - Telephone (775) 684-1890 - Fax (775) 687-6409
          Las Vegas: 3340 W. Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 - Telephone (702) 486-2650 - Fax (702) 486-2660
                                       www.labor.nv.gov      [email protected]

Page 3

    Thank you for reaching out to the Office of the Labor Commissioner with your questions.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide information and education regarding Nevada labor laws,
and their application. Should you need any additional clarification, please do not hesitate to contact
our office at (702) 486-4650.

Sincerely,

Brett K. Harris, Esq.
Labor Commissioner

    Carson City: 1818 E. College Parkway, Suite 102, Carson City, Nevada 89706 - Telephone (775) 684-1890 - Fax (775) 687-6409
          Las Vegas: 3340 W. Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 - Telephone (702) 486-2650 - Fax (702) 486-2660
                                       www.labor.nv.gov      [email protected]

Get the answer for your situation

You just read Nevada's guidance on this. Ezel checks current Nevada labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.