🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
MA Opinion Letter May 16, 2003 Active
Back to Massachusetts guidance

Home-to-work travel in a company van isn't compensable if conditions are met

Summary: An employer whose field technicians travel from home to customer worksites in company-provided vans asked whether that home-to-work travel is compensable working time. DLS adopted the federal Portal-to- Portal Act framework: ordinary commuting in an employer-provided vehicle stays non-compensable if the vehicle is of an ordinary commuting type, the employee incurs no out-of-pocket costs, travel stays within the normal commuting area, and vehicle use is by agreement — incidental tasks like a dispatcher call or loading a few parts don't change that. Relevant to employers with field service technicians who take company vehicles home.

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current Massachusetts labor law, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Massachusetts Department of Labor Standards (DLS). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

Minimum Wage Opinion Letter 05-16-03 - Commuting in Employer-Supplied Vehicles

May 16, 2003

I am writing in response to your request for this Office's written opinion regarding travel time under the
Massachusetts Minimum Fair Wage Law, M.G.L. c. 151, and regulations promulgated thereunder. Specifically,
you would like to know if your client's employees' home to work travel in a company-provided vehicle at the
beginning and the end of the day constitutes compensable working time under Massachusetts law. [1]

As I understand it, your client's employees service electronic equipment. These employees do not work at a
fixed location, but regularly report to different customer facilities on an as needed basis. Employees are
provided with company vans (similar to family vans), equipped with parts and tools, to travel to and from these
work sites. The employees are permitted to take the vans home, use the vans for some personal purposes, and
the employer company pays all expenses of travel (gas, oil, maintenance, insurance).

Employees receive their first work assignment for the day by telephone call or e-mail on the afternoon before
each working day. Employees call the dispatcher in the morning to confirm that there is no change in the work
assignment, and then the employees drive the company vehicles to the various work sites. At times, employees
may receive an overnight delivery of a few parts at their home. In such cases, the employees place the parts in
the vans prior to leaving for the work site the next morning. You have questioned whether these activities affect
the compensability of the commuting time.

Ordinary travel between home and work is not compensable working time. 455 C.M.R. §2.03(4)(a). Travel
required after the beginning of, or before the close of, the workday is compensable working time. 455 C.M.R.
§2.03(4)(b). When an employee uses an employer-provided vehicle for travel to and from work, this Office
determines the start of the work day in a manner consistent with analogous federal law, the federal Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA) and the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, as amended by the FLSA Amendments of 1996.
See Goodrow v. Lane Bryant, Inc., 423 Mass. 165, 169-170 (2000) (in the absence of a statutory definition, we
may look to interpretations of analogous federal statutes for guidance).

The mere fact that the employee is traveling in a company-provided vehicle, with tools and materials, does not,
in and of itself, transform ordinary commuting time into compensable working time. Provided that: 1) the
vehicle is of the type that does not impose a greater difficulty to operate than a vehicle normally used for
commuting; 2) the employee incurs no out-of-pocket expenses for driving, parking, or otherwise maintaining
the employer's vehicle; 3) travel is within the normal commuting area for the employer's business; and 4) use of
the employer's vehicle is subject to an agreement on the part of the employer and the employee, or his or her
representative, the employee's home to work travel does not constitute compensable working time. See e.g. U.S.
Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division Opinion Letters, dated April 18, 2001 & January 29, 1999. The
phone call to the dispatcher and the placement of a few parts in the vehicle would be considered activities
performed by the employee which are incidental to the use of the vehicle for commuting and would not affect
the non-compensability of the home to work travel.

I hope this information has been helpful. Please note that this opinion is based solely on the information
provided with your request. The existence of other facts not contained in your request might require a different
conclusion. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,
Lisa C. Price
Legal Counsel


Page 2

Footnotes:

  1. Please note that employers are also subject to the federal minimum wage and hour law, found in the Fair
    Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and regulations promulgated thereunder. For information about applicable federal
    wage and hour laws, you should contact the U.S. Department of Labor.

Get the answer for your situation

You just read Massachusetts's guidance on this. Ezel checks current Massachusetts labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.