🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Richard A. Schell

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas district Retired 2023 · served 1988–2023 Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 18 signed orders read

Judge Schell no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Schell decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

At the pleading stage, he required plausible factual allegations but did not require a plaintiff to prove the case in the complaint.

“Motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) are disfavored and are rarely granted.”

He resolved ambiguous insurance-policy language in favor of the insured when the exclusion was not clear from the policy and pleadings.

“any doubt on that issue must be resolved in the insured’s favor.”

He treated the written terms of benefit plans and the administrative record as central in disability-benefit review.

“A claims administrator commits an abuse of discretion only if it acts ‘arbitrarily or capriciously.’”

Cautions

He excluded evidence that did not satisfy authentication and admissibility requirements at summary judgment.

“Because Meh-men appears to have no opposition to Collin County’s Motion to Strike, and because the court finds the Motion to be independently meritorious, Collin County’s Objection to the Holstein email is sustained.”

He treated personal jurisdiction as a threshold requirement and dismissed without prejudice when the defendant lacked sufficient forum contacts.

“Because the court has found it does not have personal jurisdiction, it will not address the subject-matter jurisdiction argument.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Evanston Insurance Co. v. McChristian
· 2007-03-26
Summary judgment (plaintiff Evanston Insurance Company) Denied

“the motion is hereby DENIED.”

United States v. Eckman
· 2008-05-02
Motion for partial summary judgment (United States) Granted

“the United States’ motion for partial summary judgment (docket entry # 9) is hereby GRANTED.”

Cruise v. Monington
· 2007-10-09
Summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (de # 21) should be, and hereby is, DENIED.”

Korotney v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
· 2008-09-19
Summary judgment (defendant Sears Roebuck and Company) Granted

“the ‘Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment’ (de # 26) should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.”

United States v. McLean
· 2006-01-12
Summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED”

Motion to strike affidavits (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ Motion to Strike Affidavits of Lillie Parker is DENIED”

Cross motion for summary judgment (United States) Granted

“Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.”

Ressler v. General American Life Insurance Co.
· 2008-04-10
Summary judgment (defendant General American Life Insurance Company) Granted

“the court hereby GRANTS the ‘Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment’ (docket entry # 49).”

Mehmen v. Collin County, Texas
· 2007-11-13
Motions to strike (defendant Collin County) Granted

“Collin County’s Motion to Strike should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.”

Motion for partial summary judgment (plaintiff Jerry Mehmen) Denied

“Mehmen’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment should be, and hereby is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant Collin County) Granted in part

“Collin County’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be, and hereby is, GRANTED with respect to the merits of Mehmen’s pursuit of a declaratory judgment”

America's Recommended Mailers, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
· 2008-10-17
Summary judgment (defendant Maryland Casualty Company) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (docket entry # 18) is GRANTED;”

Cross motion for partial summary judgment (plaintiff America's Recommended Mailers, Inc.) Denied

“Plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment (docket entry # 24) is DENIED.”

Motion to alter or amend judgment (plaintiff America's Recommended Mailers, Inc.) Denied

“ORDERED that the Plaintiffs motion to alter or amend judgment (docket entry # 35) is hereby DENIED.”

Sweeney v. Aetna US Healthcare
· 2007-12-18
Summary judgment (plaintiff Peggy Sweeney) Denied

“the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment should be, and hereby is, DENIED.”

Cross motion for summary judgment (defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company) Granted

“the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.”

Doe ex rel. Doe v. MySpace, Inc.
· 2009-05-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant MySpace, Inc.) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendant MySpace, Ine.’s motion to dismiss (docket entry # 17) is hereby GRANTED.”

Stowe v. Russell
· 2008-03-24
Motions to dismiss (defendants Vudhi V. Slabisak, M.D. and North Texas Orthopaedic & Spine, P.A.) Denied

“Accordingly, the Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss should be denied.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant Medical Center of McKinney) Denied

“Defendant Medical Center of McKinney’s dispositive Rule 12b motion to dismiss (docket entry #35) is DENIED as well.”

Motion to transfer venue (defendants Vudhi V. Slabisak, M.D. and North Texas Orthopaedic & Spine, P.A.) Moot / procedural

“Accordingly, that portion of the Defendants’ motion seeking a transfer is MOOT.”

377 Realty Partners, L.P. v. Taffarello
· 2006-03-24
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ Second Motion to Dismiss is accordingly GRANTED and the Plaintiffs claims are hereby DISMISSED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 334 days (N = 20).

The bounded early-2008 enumeration contains twenty terminated cases. It is a narrow archival slice, not a career-wide caseload measure.

A historical record

Judge Schell no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.