🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Richard Howard Battey

United States District Court for the District of South Dakota district Retired 2017 · served 1985–2017 Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 26 signed orders read

Judge Battey no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Battey decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Battey rejected unsupported discounting of consistent treating-source opinions.

“Similarity between two physicians’ opinions does not constitute a ‘good reason’ to reject those opinions.”

He accepted an agency’s effort to reconcile competing habitat requirements through a documented management compromise.

“The Forest Supervisor made a reasonable compromise by cutting some trees and reserving others for the creation and maintenance of cover.”

Procedural preferences

Leave to amend generally followed unless delay, bad faith, prejudice, or futility justified denial.

“Leave to amend should be denied only if some reason exists for denial such as undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, undue prejudice to the opposing party, or futility in allowing the amendment.”

Bankruptcy good faith required examination of the total circumstances rather than a single timing rule.

“The court should examine the ‘totality’ of the circumstances surrounding the filing.”

Cautions

An indefinite stay was unwarranted when it would preserve a claim lacking a present factual basis.

“a stay of these proceedings pending appeal as suggested by plaintiff serves no purpose other than to delay the administration of justice.”

Once federal employee compensation covered an injury, the statutory remedy displaced other claims.

“once an injury falls within the coverage of FECA, its remedies are exclusive and no other claims can be entertained by the court.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Udager v. Astrue
593 F. Supp. 2d 1082 · 2009-01-14
Summary judgment (plaintiff claimant) Granted

“ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Docket # 9) is granted. The decision of the ALJ is reversed and the matter is remanded for further hearing.”

Federal Beef Processors, Inc. v. CBS INC.
858 F. Supp. 125 · 1994-05-03
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that Federal’s motion to amend its complaint (Docket No. 35) is granted.”

Jordan v. Union Insurance
771 F. Supp. 1031 · 1991-07-18
Motions to stay (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for stay of the proceedings is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant insurer) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice.”

Klescewski v. United States
843 F. Supp. 543 · 1993-11-12
Motions to dismiss (United States) Granted

“ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and this ease is dismissed without prejudice.”

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Armstrong Extinguisher Service, Inc.
791 F. Supp. 799 · 1992-05-12
Motion to disqualify counsel (defendants) Granted

“ORDERED that defendants' motion to remove attorney Ireland as counsel for plaintiff is granted. Plaintiff's attorney is removed.”

St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Baldwin
503 F. Supp. 2d 1255 · 2007-03-22
Summary judgment (plaintiff insurer) Granted

“ORDERED that plaintiff St. Paul Reinsurance Company Limited’s motion for summary judgment (Docket # 26) is granted.”

Planned Parenthood, Sioux Falls Clinic v. Miller
860 F. Supp. 1409 · 1994-08-22
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“The Court concludes that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment declaring the provisions of SDCL 34-23A-7 unconstitutional in not providing a bypass is granted.”

Motion for partial summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“The Court concludes that defendants’ motion to vacate stay and for partial summary judgment will be granted. The Court finds that SDCL 34-23A-10.1 is constitutional.”

In re Schuldies
122 B.R. 100 · 1990-12-14
Bankruptcy appeal (debtors appellants) Granted

“the above-entitled matter is remanded to the United States Bankruptcy Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

United States v. High Elk
715 F. Supp. 285 · 1989-07-07
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied.”

Johnson v. Viking Insurance Co. of Wisconsin
706 F. Supp. 720 · 1989-02-07
Summary judgment (defendant insurer) Granted

“ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Sierra Club v. United States Forest Service
878 F. Supp. 1295 · 1993-10-28
Summary judgment (plaintiff organizations) Denied

“ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 57) is denied.”

Summary judgment (federal defendants and intervenor) Granted

“summary judgment (Docket No. 49) are both granted.”

United States v. Black Spotted Horse
120 F. Supp. 2d 802 · 2000-09-27
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion to suppress (Dockets # 20) is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The publication-selected decisions do not establish the distribution of Battey’s full caseload.

A historical record

Judge Battey no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.