🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

William Scott Hardy

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania district Appointed by Donald Trump (Republican) 34 signed orders read

How Judge Hardy decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On a Social Security appeal he applies harmless-error rigorously: an ALJ's failure to address a particular item (here an emotional-support animal) is immaterial absent record evidence that it was 'medically necessary', and a borderline-age argument fails where the ALJ relied on vocational-expert testimony tied to the claimant's actual age and limitations.

“there is no other evidence that would show Rentz's cat was ‘medically necessary’”

Procedural preferences

When he dismisses on 12(b)(6) he strongly favors curable dismissals: he dismisses the deficient claim WITHOUT prejudice and sets a dated leave to amend, with failure to replead converting it to a with-prejudice dismissal -- so a well-pleaded amended complaint is the expected next step, not the end of the case.

“dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) ... Canaan will be afforded time to amend the claim that the Court has dismissed”

On an adopted Magistrate Judge R&R he does not rubber-stamp: he will adopt the recommended disposition in part (e.g. Eleventh Amendment immunity) while expressly declining the R&R's reasoning on a separate ground (the Heck bar) and substituting his own analysis.

“The Court adopts the R&R (ECF No. 23) as the opinion of the Court in part ... The Court does not adopt the R&R with respect to its analysis of the Heck bar.”

Cautions

He enforces motion deadlines: a belated request for LEAVE to file a Rule 12(c) judgment-on-the-pleadings motion was denied in a long-pending case, so a defendant who sits on a dispositive theory may lose the chance to raise it.

“motion for leave to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) will be denied”

On summary judgment he resists deciding fact-bound disputes prematurely: a defense MSJ was denied where the record was incomplete, and he deferred a bound-up spoliation-sanctions ruling to closer to trial rather than resolve it on the existing record.

“while the motion for summary judgment is denied, it is proper to defer a final ruling on the issue of spoliation”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Hein v. Master Builders Solutions Admixtures US, LLC
· 2023-06-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2023, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 29) is DENIED.”

Diebold v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania / Pennsylvania State Police
· 2025-03-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14) filed by defendants is granted in its entirety. The complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed with prejudice.”

Rentz v. Bisignano (Commissioner of Social Security)
· 2025-09-02
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Rentz's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 8) is DENIED and the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (government) Granted

“the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED.”

Canaan v. Carnegie Mellon University
· 2024-12-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Canaan's Complaint is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted insofar as Ms. Canaan's IIED claim is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), but denied with respect to all other claims. ... Canaan will be afforded time to amend the claim that the Court has dismissed, after which time any failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal with prejudice of that claim.”

Brown v. County of Lawrence et al. (Jordan Brown)
· 2024-10-10
Judgment on pleadings (defendant) Denied

“Defendants' motion for leave to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) will be denied. ... (Docket No. 143), which the Court construes as Defendants' motion for leave to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), is DENIED.”

Murphy v. Medlin et al.
· 2025-09-26
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“19) is GRANTED, and the claims asserted against them are DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. ... Should Plaintiff fail to timely file an Amended Complaint, the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims in the Complaint that are presently being dismissed without prejudice, will be dismissed with prejudice.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the motion is DENIED to the extent Plaintiff is seeking summary judgment, and the motion is GRANTED to the extent Plaintiff seeks to add the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole as a Defendant if Plaintiff chooses to file an Amended Complaint.”

Hudspeth v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
2:24-cv-00169-WSH
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“AND NOW, this 25th day of July 2025, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 25) is denied.”

Pruco Life Insurance Company v. Zelenski
2:18-cv-01515-WSH
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Brandi's motion to dismiss Dan and Senta's Amended Crossclaim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 41) is DENIED, and her request, in the alternative, to strike Dan and Senta's Request for Relief is DENIED.”

Motions to strike (defendant) Denied
Gibel v. Iron Cumberland, LLC
2:23-cv-02050-WSH
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 20) is DENIED.”

Mitchell v. University of Pittsburgh
2:19-cv-00525-WSH
Motion to seal (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Doc. No. 77) will be granted, and Defendant shall re-file under seal the unredacted versions of its Memorandum, Concise Statement of Material Facts, and Appendix in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment.”

Dwyer v. Dolgencorp, LLC (Dollar General)
2:23-cv-02087-WSH
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, Dollar General's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 26) is DENIED.”

Alston v. Pittsburgh Regional Transit
2:24-cv-00948-WSH
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 25) is GRANTED, and Counts I and II of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed matters include a large diisocyanates antitrust multidistrict litigation, wage-and-hour, commercial-contract, insurance, product-liability, civil-rights, and Social Security cases, along with a recent increase in immigration-detention habeas petitions. Several older cases were reassigned to Hardy after he joined the court in 2020.

Put Judge Hardy's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Hardy actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Hardy's own signed orders and cites them.