🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Lee Roy West

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma district Deceased Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 19 signed orders read

Judge West no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge West decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He denied summary judgment when factual disputes remained over the relevance of material sought by an agency.

“The Court also finds that genuine issues of material fact are present with respect to TK-7’s relevancy objection, which issues preclude summary judgment in favor of FTC.”

Cautions

He limited a common-fund fee request to work that actually contributed to creating the fund.

“limited to those efforts which contributed to creation of the fund, the award of fees in this case is limited to the time expended in collecting the amount due under the promissory note, both principal and interest.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Bundy v. Progressive Direct Insurance
· 2011-01-04
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“Bundy’s Motion for Remand to State Court [Doc. 7] filed on December 2, 2010, is DENIED.”

Motion for expedited hearing (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“The Court deems MOOT Bundy’s Motion for Expedited Hearing [Doc. 8] filed on December 10, 2010.”

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma
· 2010-06-22
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“GRANTS the Nations’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 10] filed on April 16, 2010”

Morris ex rel. Estate of Morris v. Humphrey
· 2014-10-02
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“GRANTS the Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 41] filed on August 26, 2014, by Shelton, Lancaster and Hicks”

Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
· 2011-08-11
Motion to dismiss or transfer (defendant) Granted

“GRANTS Motion to Dismiss or Transfer [Doc. 53] filed by SWB and AT & T Ops on October 20, 2010”

Burk v. Hondo Oil & Gas Co.
· 1991-04-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are hereby DENIED.”

Spencer v. Kirkpatrick
· 1995-01-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“DENIES the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the United States on September 13, 1994”

Motion to exempt funds (plaintiff) Granted

“GRANTS the plaintiffs Motion to Exempt Funds in Registry filed on July 18, 1994”

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Hulsey
· 1992-05-08
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“FDIC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to All Affirmative Defenses Based upon Plaintiff's Receipt of Proceeds of Oil and Gas Sold From Properties Securing Defendants' Obligations is GRANTED”

Leadership Bank, N.A. v. Watson (In re Watson)
· 1991-04-24
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant) Denied

“the Bankruptcy Court’s Judgment filed October 3, 1990, is AFFIRMED.”

Motion to vacate attorney fee award (appellant) Moot / procedural

“Such finding renders MOOT Watson’s request to vacate Leadership’s award of attorney fees.”

United States v. Blake
· 1990-11-08
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative', for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED.”

Motions to strike (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“the government’s Motion to Strike the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is MOOT.”

Clair v. Emrick's Van and Storage Co.
· 1999-01-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Allied, Flinn and Emrick on December 31, 1998.”

National Indemnity Co. v. United States Pollution Control, Inc.
· 1989-05-01
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs and Intervenor’s Motions for Summary Judgment are hereby DENIED.”

Summary judgment (intervenor) Denied
Miskovsky v. Skinner
· 1987-12-17
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant) Granted

“the Order of December 23,1986, is REVERSED and this action is hereby REMANDED to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.”

A historical record

Judge West no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.