🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Carl Bernard Rubin

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio district Retired 1995 · served 1971–1995 Appointed by Richard Nixon (Republican) 20 signed orders read

Judge Rubin no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Finneytown Contracting Corp.
· 1993-06-14
Summary judgment (defendant City of Cincinnati) Granted in part

“For the reasons set forth below the motion is granted in part and denied in part.”

Griffith v. Procter & Gamble Co.
· 1991-02-20
Motion for directed verdict (defendant Procter & Gamble Co.) Granted

“In accordance with the foregoing, a directed verdict in favor of each defendant is hereby GRANTED.”

Motion for directed verdict (defendant union) Granted
Dante v. Dow Corning Corp.
· 1992-02-14
Class certification (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court does find that pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3), this litigation may proceed as a class action.”

In re Gibson Greetings Securities Litigation
· 1994-12-06
Class certification (plaintiffs) Denied

“The Motion for Class Certification is hereby DENIED.”

United States ex rel. Roy v. Anthony
· 1994-07-14
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“For the forgoing reasons, the Defendants’ Motion for Dismissal is hereby DENIED.”

Reich v. Sysco Corp.
· 1994-11-08
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is, hereby, denied.”

United States v. Schreiber
· 1993-06-28
Motion to intervene (tenant intervenors) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, this Court holds that intervention is proper under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) and GRANTS the tenants’ motion to intervene.”

O'Banion v. Bowman
· 1993-05-27
Motion for directed verdict (defendants Simon Leis and Hamilton County) Granted

“Accordingly, the motion for directed verdict as to these defendants is hereby GRANTED.”

Kelbe Corp. v. Hall
· 1992-04-13
Preliminary injunction (plaintiffs) Granted

“In order to preserve the status quo pending determination of this action on the merits, the Court does therefore issue a Preliminary Injunction against defendants”

Nixon v. Allstate Insurance Co.
· 1993-08-31
Summary judgment (defendant insurer) Denied

“Accordingly, the defendant’s motion is hereby DENIED”

United States v. General Electric Co.
· 1992-12-04
Motion for attorneys fees (qui tam relator's counsel) Granted in part

“counsel for the qui tam plaintiff hereby are awarded $2,370,111.25 as attorney fees”

Motion for costs (qui tam relator's counsel) Granted

“and $221,513.99 as costs in full, as required by such section.”

Sogevalor, S.A. v. Penn Central Corp.
· 1991-06-04
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint to add Melvyn I. Weiss is well-taken and is hereby GRANTED.”

Sua sponte dismissal (court) Granted

“It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Sogevalor’s claims against defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The randomized sample of ten terminated cases includes civil-rights and prisoner matters, contract disputes, Social Security appeals, a motor-vehicle injury action, and one unclassified case. It is descriptive rather than a career caseload estimate.

A historical record

Judge Rubin no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.