🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Pierre Nelson Leval

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York district Retired 1993 · served 1977–1993 Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 18 signed orders read

Judge Leval no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Leval decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He treated fair use as demanding room to quote a subject's exact words when a biographer's critical claim depended on those words, even while separately analyzing unpublished status and remedy.

“when the purpose of a reference is to show that the copyrighted matter was dishonest, the fair use doctrine must accord substantial latitude to quote copyrighted expression”

He separated the governing procedural law from the borrowed limitations period, applying federal rules to accrual and commencement of federal civil-rights claims.

“Federal law, however, does exist around the boundaries of the borrowed statutes of limitations, and it controls when actions accrue and when they commence.”

Procedural preferences

He required the summary-judgment record to show both legal entitlement and the absence of a genuine factual dispute before denying further discovery and entering foreclosure.

“Because plaintiff has established that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law and that no issue of material fact exists”

He treated a final arbitration award as exhausting the arbitrator's authority over the decided questions.

“once an arbitrator has rendered a final award, he becomes functus officio and may not revisit his decision.”

Cautions

He distinguished records held or used by a regulated institution from records controlled by a federal agency before allowing a FOIA suit to proceed.

“The documents requested are not ‘agency records’ under FOIA.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Cohen v. Board of Education of East Ramapo Central School District
· 1982-03-31
Summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ summary judgment motion based on the statute of limitations is denied.”

Motion to certify interlocutory appeal (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ motion for certification of my abstention order is denied with prejudice.”

Motion to certify interlocutory appeal (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ request for certification of my order denying summary judgment on the basis of the statute of limitations is denied without prejudice to reassert once state court proceedings are concluded.”

United States v. $3,000,000 Obligation of Qatar National Bank
· 1993-01-19
Motions to dismiss (claimant) Denied

“The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied.”

National Cleaning Contractors, Inc. v. Local 32B-32J, Service Employees International Union
· 1993-10-15
Summary judgment (National Cleaning Contractors) Granted

“National Cleaning’s motion for summary judgment modifying the award to eliminate the finding of liability and award against it is granted.”

Motion to confirm arbitration award (union) Denied

“The Union’s motion to affirm the award is denied.”

Geren v. Quantum Chemical Corp.
· 1993-09-21
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“The motion to dismiss is granted as to all counts.”

Sibille v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
· 1991-07-11
Summary judgment (Federal Reserve Bank of New York) Granted

“Defendant Bank’s motion for summary judgment and defendant Board’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction are granted.”

Motions to dismiss (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System) Granted
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of a Vaughn index is denied.”

Pandora Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications Inc. (In re Wingspread Corp.)
· 1992-09-29
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant Pandora Industries) Denied

“The decision of the Bankruptcy Court is affirmed.”

Koeppel & Koeppel v. Federal Republic of Nigeria
· 1989-02-01
Summary judgment (defendant Bamidele E. Awokoya) Granted

“Summary judgment is granted for the defendant Bamidele E. Awokoya on the grounds of consular immunity.”

Motion for protective order (defendant Bamidele E. Awokoya) Moot / procedural

“The motion for a protective order is dismissed as moot.”

Melun Industries, Inc. v. Strange
· 1992-01-10
Motion to confirm or vacate arbitration award (defendant Michael A. Strange) Granted

“Strange’s application to confirm the Second Award and vacate the Third Award is granted.”

Motion to confirm or vacate arbitration award (plaintiff Melun Industries) Denied

“Melun’s application to confirm the Third Award and vacate the Second Award is denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant Michael A. Strange) Granted in part

“Strange’s motion for summary judgment on the second counterclaim is partially granted as to $26,914, and otherwise denied.”

Motions to dismiss (plaintiff Melun Industries) Denied

“Melun’s motion to dismiss Strange’s counterclaims is denied.”

Security Pacific Mortgage & Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Herald Center Ltd.
· 1988-07-01
Summary judgment (plaintiff Security Pacific) Granted

“summary judgment of foreclosure is granted in favor of plaintiff Security Pacific.”

Motion for discovery (defendants) Denied

“the defendants’ motion for discovery is denied”

Seybert v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots
· 1990-07-09
Summary judgment (defendant union) Granted

“Summary judgment is granted to defendant.”

Brabert Realty Co. v. 20125 Owners Corp.
· 1989-01-18
Summary judgment (plaintiff Brabert Realty) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied.”

Massachusetts Casualty Insurance v. Renstrom
· 1993-09-22
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff insurer) Denied

“Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.”

A historical record

Judge Leval no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.