🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Denny Chin

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York district Retired 2010 · served 1994–2010 Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 17 signed orders read

Judge Chin no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Chin decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In constitutional procedural-due-process cases he grounds the analysis in the concrete record of an individual claimant, using a single classification hearing to show precisely how the challenged process falls short.

“The case of proposed plaintiff Charles Coe illustrates vividly the deficiencies in the process of assigning risk levels under the Act.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United National Insurance v. Granoff, Walker & Forlenza, P.C.
· 2009-02-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“GWF’s and Degree’s motions for summary judgment are granted.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“UNIC’s motion for summary judgment is denied.”

Adorno v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
· 2010-02-19
Motion for attorneys fees (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Attorneys’ fees, costs, and prejudgment interest are awarded, but only to the extent set forth below.”

Green v. Harris Publications, Inc.
· 2004-08-11
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“the motion is granted in part and denied in part.”

Wright v. Stern
· 2008-05-15
Motion for settlement approval (plaintiff) Granted

“The Agreement is hereby approved.”

Allure Home Creation Co., Inc. v. Lamont Ltd.
· 1998-06-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Little v. City of New York
· 2007-05-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted”

Motion for discovery (plaintiff) Denied

“plaintiffs Rule 56(f) application is denied”

Jones v. Conway
· 2006-08-01
Habeas petition (plaintiff) Denied

“the petition is denied”

Crawford v. Artuz
· 2001-03-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice”

Doe v. Pataki
· 1998-05-07
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiffs’ motions are granted and defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment is denied”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted
Storey v. Cello Holdings, L.L.C.
· 2002-01-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Cello’s motion for summary judgment is denied”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Storey’s motions for summary judgment and sanctions, in the form of attorneys’ fees and costs, are granted”

Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Granted

“Sanctions will be imposed against both Cello (pursuant to Rule 11(b)(1), (3), and (4)) and its counsel”

Siano v. Haber
· 1999-03-29
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ motion is therefore granted and the complaint is dismissed.”

Rivera v. Goord
· 2000-09-26
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the motion is granted in part and denied in part.”

A historical record

Judge Chin no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.