🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Anne M. Nardacci

United States District Court for the Northern District of New York district Appointed by Joseph R. Biden (Democratic) 28 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Yeend v. Akima Global Services, LLC
1:20-cv-01281-AMN-CFH · 2024-09-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERS that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 19(b), Dkt. No. 117 at 1-21, is DENIED”

DeVinney v. Russell
9:24-cv-00572-AMN-DJS · 2025-05-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 18, is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk shall enter judgment in Defendant's favor and close this case”

Oteri v. Palmatier
9:23-cv-00986-AMN-ML · 2025-07-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERS that Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, Dkt. No. 38, is DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERS that Defendant's motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 41, is GRANTED”

Tashona R. D. v. Commissioner of Social Security
5:23-cv-00583-AMN-CFH · 2024-09-24
Judgment on the pleadings (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion, Dkt. No. 12, is DENIED”

Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Granted

“ORDERS that the Commissioner's motion, Dkt. No. 18, is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Complaint, Dkt. No. 1, is DISMISSED”

Peek et al v. Duanesburg Central School District et al
1:23-cv-00388-AMN-ML · 2023-11-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“ORDERS that Defendants' Motions to dismiss, Dkt. Nos 23, 26, are GRANTED in their entirety; and the Court further ORDERS that the Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 14, is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend”

Variscite NY Four, LLC and Variscite NY Five, LLC v. New York State Cannabis Control Board et al
1:23-cv-01599-AMN-PJE · 2026-03-25
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERS that Defendants' motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 30, is DENIED”

Henderson v. Popp et al
9:22-cv-0242-AMN-MJK · 2025-05-19
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“recommending that the Motion be granted as to Defendants Guyette, McLenithan, Popp, Fraser, and Hamel, and denied as to the retaliation claim against Defendant Jones ... The Court adopted the Report-Recommendation in its entirety”

Daniel J. S. v. Commissioner of Social Security
5:24-cv-00134-AMN-DJS · 2025-03-06
Judgment on the pleadings (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, Dkt. No. 11, is GRANTED”

Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Denied

“ORDERS that the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings, Dkt. No. 15, is DENIED”

Morgan v. City of Utica; City of Utica v. Brown (third-party)
6:22-cv-01035-AMN-ML · 2024-02-16
Default judgment (third-party plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERS that Third-Party Plaintiff's Motion, Dkt. No. 41, is DENIED”

Hyers v. Martuscello et al
9:24-cv-00962-AMN-CFH · 2025-02-05
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERS that Plaintiff's emergency omnibus motion, Dkt. No. 39, is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that the temporary restraining order, Dkt. No. 41, is VACATED”

Wachter et al v. James et al
1:25-cv-01718-AMN-CBF · 2026-06-08
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“ORDERS that Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, Dkt. No. 12, is DENIED”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“ORDERS that Defendants' cross-motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 20, is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Complaint, Dkt. No. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice”

Myers v. Davenport et al
1:21-cv-00922-AMN-CFH · 2024-11-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 47, is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims are dismissed with prejudice; and the Court further ORDERS Plaintiff's remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 369.5 days (N = 18).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 203 days (N = 3).

Nardacci's reviewed first-year civil docket includes a substantial group of Social Security disability appeals, along with copyright, mortgage and banking, trade-secret, employee-benefit, contract, fraud, medical-malpractice, civil-rights, and disability-access cases. Many matters proceeded through magistrate-judge referrals.

Put Judge Nardacci's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Nardacci actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Nardacci's own signed orders and cites them.