🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Joseph Frank Bianco

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York district Retired 2019 · served 2006–2019 Appointed by George W. Bush (Republican) 18 signed orders read

Judge Bianco no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Bianco decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In copyright cases he isolates protectable expression from general ideas and stock elements, and will resolve substantial similarity at summary judgment when the works' protected features are too dissimilar for a rational factfinder to find infringement.

“the Court concludes that any similarities between the works concern only non-copyrightable elements of plaintiffs work and, in any event, no rational trier of fact could possibly find that the works are substantially similar.”

Procedural preferences

For preliminary injunctions, unexplained delay is treated as concrete evidence against irreparable harm, even before the court reaches the merits.

“bringing the preliminary injunction motion — namely, over 18 months after plaintiff became aware of defendant’s product, and approximately 5 months after settlement discussions broke down.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Blakeman v. The Walt Disney Co.
· 2009-05-11
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the motion to, dismiss defendants Grammnet Productions and Stark for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendants are entitled to summary judgment on the copyright claim.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“That application is granted, and plaintiff will have 30 days to submit a second amended complaint”

Casseus v. Verizon New York, Inc.
· 2010-07-09
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court denies plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in its entirety”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“grants defendant’s motion in part and denies it in part.”

Mangino v. Incorporated Village of Patchogue
· 2011-09-30
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Granted in part

“the Court grants the Village defendants’ motion for reconsideration on the malicious abuse of process claim and the Court grants summary judgment in favor of defendant Nudo on that claim based upon qualified immunity. The Court denies the Village defendants’ motion for reconsideration of the Court’s denial of summary judgment on the Fourth Amendment claim”

O'Grady v. Middle Country School District No. 11
· 2008-04-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.”

Small v. Bud-K Worldwide, Inc.
· 2012-09-28
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the plaintiff and Bud-K’s motions for partial summary judgment are denied”

Summary judgment (defendant Bud-K) Denied
Summary judgment (county defendants) Granted

“the County defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Sea Tow Services International, Inc. v. Pontin
· 2009-03-16
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“defendants’ motion and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment on their respective breach of contract claims are denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the cross-motions for summary judgment are denied in their entirety.”

Lax v. 29 Woodmere Boulevard Owners, Inc.
· 2011-09-23
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the Wood-mere defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied.”

Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court denies plaintiffs motion for sanctions against counsel for the Woodmere defendants.”

Hawkins v. Nassau County Correctional Facility
· 2011-02-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is granted.”

Schultz v. Tribune ND, Inc.
· 2010-12-08
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“plaintiffs motion to remand is denied.”

Weiss v. Incorporated Village of Sag Harbor
· 2011-01-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety as it relates to plaintiffs federal claims.”

Kantrowitz v. Uniondale Union Free School District
· 2011-09-30
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“the Court denies defendants’ motion for summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs race and age discrimination claims, but grants defendants’ motion with respect to plaintiffs disability discrimination claim.”

Guida v. Home Savings of America, Inc.
· 2011-06-28
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Granted in part

“the Court grants in part and denies in part defendant’s motion to compel arbitration.”

A historical record

Judge Bianco no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.