🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Jennifer M. Rozzoni

United States District Court for the District of New Mexico magistrate 10 signed orders read

How Judge Rozzoni decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

On qualified-immunity summary judgment she resolves the legal question on the briefs and, where the officers prevail, recommends dismissal with prejudice and treats pending damages-amendment motions as mooted.

“Because defendants have qualified immunity, I recommend the Court GRANT the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) and DENY the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45).”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Nidiffer v. Lovato
1:22-cv-00374-MV-JMR
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“I find that the three defendants are entitled to qualified immunity as to both counts. Because defendants have qualified immunity, I recommend the Court GRANT the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) ... Finally, I recommend that the Court dismiss the case with prejudice.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“I recommend the Court ... DENY the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45).”

Scott v. NP Truckline, Inc.
1:23-cv-01067-MLG-JMR
Motion to approve settlement (joint) Granted

“The PFRD recommends the Court grant the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Involving Minors and to Set a Fairness Hearing. Doc. 104. ... The Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, Doc. 118, is adopted. ... The Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Involving Minors and to Set a Fairness Hearing, Doc. 104, is granted.”

Way v. Probation and Parole (Raheem Way v. Timothy Hatch, et al.)
1:23-cv-00223-WJ-JMR · 2025-03-11
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“I recommend that the Court GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART defendants' Motion to Dismiss. I recommend the Court grant in part defendants' motion by finding that: (1) Plaintiff fails to state a § 1983 claim against defendants in their official capacity. ... I recommend the Court deny in part defendants' motion by finding that: (1) Plaintiff sufficiently states a failure to protect claim against each defendant in their individual capacities under § 1983. ... (2) Defendant Hatch is not entitled to qualified immunity at the pleading stage.”

Manuelito v. United States
1:22-cv-00720-JB-JMR · 2023-12-18
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Mr. Manuelito fails to show that he is entitled to relief for any of these three grounds. I therefore recommend that the Court deny Mr. Manuelito's Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 3) with prejudice.”

Valdiviez v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC
1:24-cv-00241-MV-JMR · 2024-08-01
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Having reviewed the parties' submissions and the relevant law, I recommend that the Court GRANT plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 6) because removal was untimely.”

Motion for discovery (defendant) Denied

“The Motion for Discovery (Doc. 10) is denied. ... By local rule, I am assigned to decide the Motion for Discovery. See D.N.M.LR-Civ. 73.1(a) ... see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).”

Blinman v. Lujan Grisham
1:23-cv-00431
Motion for leave to file surreply (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply to the Reply in Support of Defendant Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 93) is DENIED.”

Saul v. U.S. Bank National Association
1:24-cv-01082
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“I recommend that the Court: 1. Dismiss this case without prejudice for impermissible claim splitting, and 2. Deny Ms. Saul's Request for Leave of Court to File Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 29) as futile.”

Lipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools
1:23-cv-00899

Acting on its own, the court struck both sides' briefing on a pending discovery motion for failing to follow its order, and warned plaintiff's counsel that fabricated and misrepresented case citations could lead to sanctions: "the Court hereby STRIKES defendant Albuquerque Public Schools' supplement response (Doc. 105) and plaintiff's reply (Doc. 107) to plaintiff's pending discovery motion (Doc. 88)."

Griego v. United States
1:23-cv-00190
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“I therefore recommend that the Court deny Mr. Griego's Motion to Vacate Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1) and dismiss the case with prejudice.”

Way v. Hatch
1:23-cv-00223
Failure to prosecute Granted

“For that reason, I recommend that the Court dismiss Mr. Way's case without prejudice for failure to prosecute.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 293.0 days (N = 8).

By party consent, Judge Rozzoni enters final decisions in Social Security disability appeals. She also writes recommendations in civil-rights, prisoner, and post-conviction cases. This describes the composition of her work, not a grant rate.

Put Judge Rozzoni's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Rozzoni actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Rozzoni's own signed orders and cites them.