🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Tonianne J. Bongiovanni

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey magistrate 30 signed orders read

How Judge Bongiovanni decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On a Rule 15 motion to amend she keeps the inquiry narrow -- futility is measured only against the proposed amendments under the 12(b)(6) standard -- and treats most of the defendant's substantive merits/statute-of-limitations arguments as premature, to be raised by 'substantive dispositive motion' rather than on an opposition to leave to amend.

“To the extent Defendants seek to challenge the sufficiency of same, the appropriate procedure is for them to do so in a substantive dispositive motion not in their opposition to Plaintiffs' pending motion to amend.”

She will, however, deny an amendment that is clearly futile as a matter of settled law -- here, ADA money-damages claims against the State, barred by Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity, which voluntary removal waives only as to suit in a federal forum, not as to liability.

“while voluntary removal waives a State's immunity from suit in a federal forum, the removing State retains all defenses it would have enjoyed had the matter been litigated in state court, including immunity from liability.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

American General Life Insurance Co. v. Goldklang Savings Irrevocable Trust
3:08-cv-03489-MLC-LHG · 2009-03-16
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“AGLIC'S MOTION TO AMEND IS GRANTED AND AGLIC SHALL FILE ITS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN MARCH 23, 2009.”

Allen v. State of New Jersey
3:16-cv-05672-AET-TJB · 2020-12-16
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiffs' motion to amend is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Chavarriaga v. New Jersey Dept of Corrections
3:12-cv-04313-MAS-TJB · 2016-04-04
Involuntary dismissal failure to prosecute (court) Granted

“RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE”

Druz v. Boro of Belmar
3:15-cv-08550-BRM-TJB · 2017-07-06
Involuntary dismissal failure to prosecute (court) Granted

“ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) is hereby adopted and entered; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE”

Dorval v. Ahsan
3:14-cv-03271-FLW-TJB · 2018-08-06
Involuntary dismissal failure to prosecute (court) Granted

“ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dated August 6, 2018, is hereby ADOPTED; and it is further, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute”

Beekman v. Excelsior Insurance
3:14-cv-00363-AET-TJB · 2014-09-10
Motions to remand (unspecified) Moot / procedural

“RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Complaint be REMANDED to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County”

Williams v. City of Trenton
3:11-cv-06352-MAS-TJB · 2012-10-11
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is DENIED.”

Danella Rental Systems, Inc. v. IEW Construction Group, Inc.
3:16-cv-00783-MAS-TJB · 2018-05-30
Motions to compel (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's Motion to Compel is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED without PREJUDICE, in part.”

Falato v. Fotografixusa, L.L.C.
3:09-cv-05232-JAP-TJB · 2010-12-21
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs' motion to amend their Complaint to join Fotografixusa, Inc. as a defendant is granted.”

Motion to set aside default (defendant) Moot / procedural

“the Court finds that Fotografixusa, LLC's motion to set aside default is moot and is dismissed as such.”

Giordano v. West Orange Board of Education
3:14-cv-04202-PGS-TJB · 2016-10-17
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion to Amend is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Newtechbio Inc. v. Septicleanse, Inc.
3:12-cv-05882-MAS-TJB · 2015-06-26
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“Newtechbio's motion for reconsideration and Septicleanse's cross motion for sanctions are DENIED.”

Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied
Depomed Inc. v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
3:13-cv-00571-JAP-TJB · 2013-11-26
Motion to bifurcate (defendant) Denied

“Purdue's motion to bifurcate the trial of this matter and to stay all damages and willfulness related discovery is DENIED.”

Put Judge Bongiovanni's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Bongiovanni actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Bongiovanni's own signed orders and cites them.