🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Madeline Cox Arleo

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 8 signed orders read

How Judge Arleo decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

At the pleading stage she declines to dismiss alternative ERISA section 502(a)(3) equitable claims as duplicative of section 502(a)(1)(B) benefit claims; reformation/rescission availability depends on the totality of circumstances and is premature to resolve on a 12(b)(6) motion, though she signals the duplicative claims can be revisited later.

“several courts in this district and circuit have found that Varity does not establish a bright line rule precluding the assertion of alternative claims under sections 502(a)(1)(B) and 502(a)(3) at the motion to dismiss stage.”

Procedural preferences

Rigorously enforces Article III standing as a threshold issue and applies TransUnion strictly: in a consumer FDCPA case, a plaintiff's confusion, fear, or emotional distress from a misleading letter -- without reliance or a concrete downstream consequence -- is not an injury in fact, and the absence of standing defeats even a certified class on summary judgment.

“merely receiving a letter from a debt collector that was confusing or misleading . . . does not demonstrate a harm closely related to fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation -- both of which require some form of reliance.”

Will not rule on a default-judgment motion submitted without a supporting brief; expects the movant to specify the causes of action and prove damages, and dismisses the motion without prejudice to refile rather than guessing.

“Absent a brief, it is unclear under which causes of action Plaintiffs move for default judgment. The Motion is DISMISSED without prejudice”

Cautions

Abstains under Colorado River from federal FDCPA/consumer-fraud suits that are collateral attacks on a parallel pending state foreclosure; such suits, if allowed, would 'throw into turmoil' the parties' rights and the comity between courts, and the state court is an adequate forum for the federal claims.

“This district has repeatedly invoked Colorado River to abstain from hearing what amount to collateral attacks on pending state foreclosure actions.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

High Crest Functional Medicine, LLC v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc.
2:15-cv-08876 · 2017-03-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“ORDERED that Okonite's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 57, is DENIED as to Counts Two and Three but GRANTED as to Count Four”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“ORDERED that the Novartis Defendants' motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 62, is DENIED as to Counts Two and Three, DENIED as to Count Four against Novartis, but GRANTED as to Count Four against PSE&G and NRG.”

Peavy v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
2:15-cv-06001 · 2016-06-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Balancing all the factors, the Court finds abstention is warranted in this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is dismissed without prejudice... Defendants' motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 5, is GRANTED.”

Portal v. Levine
2:19-cv-19611 · 2020-10-20
Default judgment (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Absent a brief, it is unclear under which causes of action Plaintiffs move for default judgment. The Motion is DISMISSED without prejudice, and Plaintiffs may refile the Motion with a brief”

Schultz v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
2:16-cv-04415 · 2022-07-29
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Plaintiffs have failed to establish that they have suffered a concrete harm sufficient to establish standing, and therefore the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over their claims. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 131, is DENIED”

Motion to decertify class (defendant) Moot / procedural

“the Motion to Decertify the Class, ECF No. 124, is DENIED AS MOOT.”

August Uribe Fine Art, LLC v. Dartmilano SRL
2:22-cv-03104 · 2025-12-19
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Crippa’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 225, is GRANTED”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Sotheby’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 241, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Art Lending’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 238, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Motion in limine (defendant) Denied

“Art Lending’s Motion in limine, ECF No. 238, is DENIED”

Tomasello v. ICF Technology, Inc.
2:23-cv-03759 · 2025-04-23
Class certification (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, ECF No. 51, is GRANTED.”

Akhemedov v. Pittman
2:25-cv-13734 · 2026-02-06
Motion to enforce judgment (petitioner) Granted

“ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Enforce Judgment (ECF No. 10.) is GRANTED;”

Sokhadze v. Soto
2:26-cv-02931 · 2026-04-22
Motion for temporary restraining order (petitioner) Denied

“ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for a TRO or a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 4) is denied without prejudice for the reasons stated herein; and it is further”

Put Judge Arleo's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Arleo actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Arleo's own signed orders and cites them.