🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

George Scott Register

United States District Court for the District of North Dakota district Retired 1972 · served 1955–1972 Appointed by Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Register no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Register decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Register avoided an unnecessary constitutional ruling when statutory construction fully protected the plaintiff's rights.

“No determination need be, or should be, made as to the constitutionality of any one or more of the North Dakota statutes here under attack.”

He treated substantial population-based vote dilution as incompatible with equal protection and refused to accept the legislature's deficient plan.

“said Bill does not comply with the constitutional requisites of the Equal Protection Clause of the Federal Constitution, and is therefore a nullity.”

Procedural preferences

Register described summary judgment as an extreme remedy but granted it when no recovery was possible under any discernible circumstances.

“A summary judgment is an extreme remedy, and, under the rule, should be awarded only when the truth is quite clear.”

He protected final probate decrees from collateral attack by parties or their privies.

“A final decree of distribution issued by a County Court has equal rank with a judgment of other courts, and has the same immunity from collateral attack.”

Cautions

Register required the absence of any genuine factual dispute before granting summary judgment.

“The judgment is authorized only where the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, where it is quite-clear what the truth is, and that no genuine issue remains for trial.”

He acknowledged equitable hardship but followed the governing law even when agency action appeared unwarranted.

“Notwithstanding these views the Court is, as stated, compelled to hold in favor of the Defendants.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Sherck v. Hagan
135 F. Supp. 293 · 1955-11-10
Motions to dismiss (Hagan) Denied

“For the reasons hereinbefore stated, such motion will be denied.”

Workmen's Compensation Bureau v. H. F. Johnson Co.
135 F. Supp. 901 · 1955-12-07
Summary judgment (H. F. Johnson Company) Granted

“For the reasons hereinbefore stated, defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.”

Knoshaug v. Pollman
18 F.R.D. 386 · 1956-01-11
Motion to dismiss counterclaim (plaintiff) Granted

“the motion of plaintiff for the dismissal thereof be granted, but it will be the further order of this Court that the defendant may serve and file an amended counterclaim containing averments which may be properly pleaded as a counterclaim within 20 days from the date of the order herein.”

Brownell v. Leutz
136 F. Supp. 783 · 1956-01-11
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“It is the opinion of this Court that defendants’ motion for summary judgment should be denied as to all counts, except as to Count One and Count Five, as aforesaid.”

Alden v. Central Power Electric Cooperative, Inc.
137 F. Supp. 924 · 1956-01-19
Jurisdictional dismissal (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons hereinbefore stated, said action and counterclaim will be dismissed.”

United States v. Shaw
137 F. Supp. 24 · 1956-01-24
Crop insurance claim (United States) Granted

“Judgment will be granted in favor of the plaintiff in accordance with the plaintiff’s prayer.”

Metzler v. Bolen
137 F. Supp. 457 · 1956-01-30
Contract reformation claim (Metzler) Denied

“For the reasons hereinbefore stated, judgment will be for the defendant.”

Rosenquist v. Harris
138 F. Supp. 21 · 1956-02-15
Claim for relief (Rosenquist) Denied

“For the reasons hereinbefore stated, judgment will be for the defendants.”

Hull v. Tollefson
138 F. Supp. 315 · 1956-02-20
Motions to dismiss (United States) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, an Order sustaining the motion to dismiss as to the United States of America will be made and entered.”

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Grundeen
138 F. Supp. 498 · 1956-02-21
Summary judgment (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company) Granted

“there is no genuine-issue of fact to be tried, that plaintiff' is entitled to judgment as a matter of‘ law, and that the motion for summary-judgment should be granted.”

Hove v. Atchison
138 F. Supp. 486 · 1956-02-29
Lease cancellation claim (plaintiffs) Denied

“it is the further opinion of this Court that said lease is a valid and subsisting lease on the said premises.”

Claim to delay rental deposits (plaintiffs) Granted

“Plaintiffs are entitled to all thereof.”

Eide v. Tveter
143 F. Supp. 665 · 1956-08-24
Oil and gas lease claim (Eide) Denied

“It is the opinion of this Court that the purported lease to the plaintiff is void and of no legal effect.”

Refund claim (Eide) Granted

“Plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the $601 paid for the lease.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The twenty-five reviewed decisions cover varied litigation but do not establish the distribution of Register's full caseload.

A historical record

Judge Register no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.