🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

John Davis

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts district Retired 1841 · served 1801–1841 Appointed by John Adams (Federalist) 19 signed orders read

Judge Davis no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Davis decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Davis treated maintenance and cure as extending to necessary care ashore when a seaman was injured while serving the ship.

“I find myself bound to award to the libelant a reimbursement for the expenses of cure and of board, nursing, and attendance during the operation.”

Davis required strict and uniform proof before allowing an asserted maritime custom to alter a seaman's rights.

“in order to establish such a custom as the one contended for, it was necessary that the proof should be strict, and the custom uniform.”

Procedural preferences

Davis used security for costs and damages to permit appellate testing of an important but doubtful maritime claim without leaving the vessel owners unprotected.

“Security for costs and damages appears to be a reasonable requisite, preliminary to further proceedings;”

Cautions

Davis distinguished serious seamen's misconduct from conduct warranting complete wage forfeiture, using proportional deductions instead.

“I cannot consider it when all circumstances are taken into view, as operating a forfeiture of their whole wages.”

Davis could protect a government officer who made a mistaken seizure when the record showed sincere performance of official duty without improper motive.

“In the present case, the collector, as appears to me, acted with a sincere conviction that he was in the correct and requisite performance of his official duty, without any culpable or unworthy motive.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Clark v. The Leopard
Bottomry bond claim (libellant) Denied

“The judge then declared that he must dismiss tbe libel with costs to the claimants.”

Chatfield v. The Wolga
Seamen wage claim (seaman) Granted

“Wherefore he decreed that the libel-lant should recover his whole claim, with costs.”

The Nathaniel Hooper
Salvage claim (salvors) Granted

“made a decree, giving to the salvors one-half of the nett proceeds”

Dexter v. The Richmond
Pilotage compensation claim (pilots) Granted in part

“he should give them the amount tendered, .of $150, and one-half of their costs.”

The Tigris
Private forfeiture claim (foreign naval officer) Denied

“Libel dismissed.”

United States v. Brodhead
Government debt claim (United States) Denied

“But the jury find a balance due from the United States to said Brodhead of $345,-67.”

Public officer compensation claim (Brodhead) Granted
Williams v. The Juno
Seamen wage claim (seaman) Granted

“I therefore decree to the libellant wages at the stipulated rate to the time of his return to Salem, deducting the $39 previously ad-yaneed, and his proportion of salvage.”

Rich v. Cherub
Fishing share claim (fishermen) Granted in part

“The libellants, therefore, are to be respectively credited with this sum, and charged with what they may have-received; and the decree will be accordingly as the balance may appear.”

Canfield v. Reed
Maintenance and cure claim (seaman) Granted

“I find myself bound to award to the libelant a reimbursement for the expenses of cure and of board, nursing, and attendance during the operation.”

United States v. One Hempen Cable & One Hempen Hawser
Government forfeiture claim (United States) Denied

“I have no hesitation in decreeing that they be restored to the claimants.”

Peabody v. Proceeds of Twenty-eight Bags of Cotton
Supplemental salvage claim (salvors) Denied

“This supplemental libel will be dismissed, and the requisite orders will be entered to transfer these proceeds, and other money remaining in the registry under similar circumstances, to the proper department of the government, on the principles and in the manner that have been indicated.”

Healey v. Martin
Maritime tort claim (seaman) Denied

“With these views of the subject, I must dismiss the libel, with costs.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No case-level docket record was returned for Davis's 1801-1841 tenure. The profile therefore makes no claim about caseload mix, case duration, administrative dispositions, or motion timing.

A historical record

Judge Davis no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.