🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Hugh Dean McLellan

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts district Retired 1941 · served 1932–1941 Appointed by Herbert Hoover (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge McLellan no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge McLellan decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

McLellan treated binding circuit precedent as controlling even where other authorities or administrative rules suggested a different tax result.

“I am bound by White v. Consolidated Equities”

McLellan confined tort recovery to duties existing independently of a contract, leaving purely contractual obligations to contract remedies.

“But where, as in this case, there is no duty except such as the contract creates, I think the plaintiff’s only remedy is for breach of the contract.”

Procedural preferences

McLellan denied summary judgment when he could not say with assurance that the record eliminated every genuine issue of material fact.

“I cannot say with assurance that ‘there is no genuine issue as to any material fact’”

McLellan treated interrogatories as timely when the governing rules imposed no contrary deadline, while requiring the moving party to use the proper enforcement sequence.

“The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizing 'Interrogatories to Parties (see Rule 33, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c) contain no provisions requiring a determination that these interrogatories which were filed in October, 1940, are too late”

Cautions

McLellan did not permit a party to manufacture a diversity defect after filing when jurisdiction existed at the action's commencement.

“The motion may not be allowed upon this ground, because whatever the situation later may have become, there was sufficient diversity of citizenship at the time the action was begun.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

The Vizcaya
Exception to admiralty claim (libellee) Granted

“the libellee’s exceptions are sus*1021tained.”

Greeley v. General Seafoods Corp.
Motion for more definite statement (defendant) Granted in part

“The motion is allowed to the extent hereafter stated and is in other respects denied.”

In re Ronka
Motion to amend objections (objecting creditor) Denied

“I ought to deny the motion as a matter of discretion and that I do.”

Ex parte Chin Ben Shim
Voluntary dismissal (habeas petitioner) Denied

“The motion is denied.”

Kendall Co. v. Earnshaw Knitting Co.
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“I cannot say with assurance that ‘there is no genuine issue as to any material fact’”

Boynton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
Motion to prevent deposition (plaintiff) Denied

“The motion accordingly is denied”

Guerin v. Portland Trawling Co.
Motion for bill of particulars (defendant) Granted

“Such a bill of particulars to be filed in or within thirty (30) days.”

Commission v. Daley
Motion for judgment on pleadings (plaintiff) Denied

“Under the circumstances the motion for judgment on the pleadings is not granted.”

Whitkop v. Baldwin
Motion to compel interrogatory answers (defendant) Granted

“these interrogatories should be answered, and it is so ordered.”

United States v. W. E. O'Neil Const. Co.
Objection to interrogatories (defendant) Denied

“the objections are overruled.”

Motion to compel interrogatory answers (intervenor) Denied

“The intervenoFs motion that the defendant be ordered to answer the interrogatories, also heard today, is denied”

American & Foreign Ins. v. Richard Gibson & Sons, Inc.
Objection to interrogatories (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“The conclusion is that the objection to Interrogatory 3 is overruled, the objection to Interrogatory 12(c) is sustained, and the objections to Interrogatories 13(b) and 14 are sustained.”

Britt v. Cole Drug Co.
Motions to dismiss (employer) Denied

“the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action is denied.”

Motion for bill of particulars (employer) Granted

“That part of the defendant’s motion seeking a bill of particulars is granted”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No case-level docket record was returned for McLellan's 1932-1941 tenure. The profile therefore makes no claim about caseload mix, case duration, administrative dispositions, or motion timing.

A historical record

Judge McLellan no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.