🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Francis Joseph William Ford

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts district Retired 1972 · served 1938–1972 Appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Ford no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Ford decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Ford required evidence supporting a reasonable probability of success before granting preliminary relief, and independently enforced an express statutory bar on injunctions.

“the Court cannot find that plaintiffs, on the evidence now before the Court, have shown a reasonable probability of proving their contentions at a full trial on the merits”

Ford required a public-figure libel plaintiff to identify evidence of actual malice rather than rely on allegations questioning a publisher's investigation.

“plaintiff has failed to produce any indication of any factual evidence to sustain a contention that defendant’s publication was made with actual malice.”

Procedural preferences

Ford denied summary judgment when the asserted contractual relationship depended on disputed material facts.

“This contention clearly raises questions of material fact which must be resolved before the Court can pass on the question”

Ford would not enforce a contractual forum restriction that displaced jurisdiction supplied by a federal statute.

“Parties cannot by contract oust the District Court of the jurisdiction conferred upon it.”

Cautions

Ford treated military activation decisions as beyond judicial review when the commanding authority acted within its discretion.

“The Commanding General, First United States Army, was well within his discretion to order the petitioner to active duty and the decision is not reviewable by this Court.”

Ford distinguished negligent handling from a deliberate contractual deviation and therefore enforced the shipment contract's damages limitation.

“Mere negligent handling of the shipment is not such a deviation from contract terms as to justify rescission.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Analytical Systems Corp. v. Small Business Administration
Preliminary injunction (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction is denied.”

Forbro Design Corp. v. Raytheon Co.
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied.”

O. Hodgkins Sales Corp. v. Chrysler Corp.
Summary judgment (Chrysler Leasing Corporation) Granted in part

“Motion for summary judgment of Chrysler Leasing Corporation is granted as to Count I of plaintiff’s complaint; denied as to Count II.”

Summary judgment (Avis, Inc., Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., and General Rental Company) Granted

“Motion for summary judgment of Avis, Inc., Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., and General Rental Company granted as to Count I.”

United States ex rel. Gigliello v. Sovereign Construction Co.
Motions to stay (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to stay is denied.”

United States v. Dineen
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment is allowed.”

ITT Lamp Division of The International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. Minter
Temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Denied

“The motion for a temporary restraining order is denied.”

In re Boston & Maine Corp.
Petition to abandon rail line (trustees) Granted

“The petitions for authorization to apply to the Interstate Commerce Commission for leave to abandon the Concord-Lincoln and Northfield-Franklin Falls lines are allowed.”

Johnson v. Resor
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted

“Judgment will be entered for petitioner, granting the writ of habeas corpus and discharging petitioner from the custody of respondents.”

Medina v. Time, Inc.
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is allowed and judgment will be entered for defendant dismissing the complaint.”

Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. Leo's Used Car Exchange, Inc.
Claim after bench trial (plaintiff) Granted

“Judgment will be entered for plaintiff for $15,150 with interest from October 9, 1968.”

Condakes v. Southern Pacific Co.
Claim after bench trial (plaintiff) Denied

“Judgment will be entered for defendant.”

Fleming v. Travelers Indemnity Company
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss is allowed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No case-level docket record was returned for Ford's 1938-1975 tenure. The profile therefore makes no claim about caseload mix, case duration, administrative dispositions, or motion timing.

A historical record

Judge Ford no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.