🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Richard Johnson Putnam

United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana district Retired 2002 · served 1961–2002 Appointed by John F. Kennedy (Democratic) 23 signed orders read

Judge Putnam no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Iglinsky v. Finch
· 1970-04-09
Summary judgment (Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) Granted

“Accordingly, the Secretary’s motion should be, and the same is hereby, granted.”

Toups v. Texaco, Inc.
· 1970-09-14
Plea of prescription (defendants) Denied

“Here, plaintiff has met the requirements of Saxon and we hold that the plea of prescription now advanced by these defendants must be and is hereby denied.”

Minvielle v. Shell Oil Co.
· 1971-01-20
Summary judgment (defendant Shell Oil Co.) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Shell Oil Company be and the same is hereby granted.”

Gonsoulin v. Shell Oil Co.
· 1971-01-20
Summary judgment (defendant Shell Oil Co.) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Shell Oil Company be and the same is hereby GRANTED.”

Whittington v. Gulf Oil Corporation
· 1971-02-04
Summary judgment (Gulf Oil Corp., Gulf Refining Co., and Travelers Insurance Co.) Granted

“It is therefore ordered that the motion for summary judgment filed by Gulf Oil Corporation, Gulf Refining Company and their insurer, Travelers Insurance Company, be and the same is hereby granted, and plaintiff’s suit as to these defendants is dismissed.”

Broussard v. Amerada Petroleum Corporation
· 1972-11-08
Summary judgment (defendant Amerada Petroleum Corp.) Granted

“Accordingly, judgment will be rendered herein sustaining defendant’s motion for summary judgment, overruling plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment and dismissing plaintiff’s suit.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff Broussard) Denied
Griffin v. Jackson Parish School Board
· 1973-09-19
Attorney fee request (plaintiff James Griffin) Denied

“Accordingly, we find that this case does not fall within the exceptions to the general rule and we deny plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees.”

Harrington v. Arceneaux
· 1973-10-18
Habeas petition (petitioner Harrington) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, petitioner’s application for habeas corpus is hereby denied and it is so ordered.”

Reed-Joseph Co. v. Farm Storage & Equipment Co.
· 1974-04-04
Debt claim (plaintiff Reed-Joseph Co., against the individual defendants) Denied

“Accordingly, plaintiff is not entitled to judgment against the individual defendants, Clifton M. Dupont and C. Henry Cowen, Jr.”

Debt claim (plaintiff Reed-Joseph Co., against the corporate defendant) Granted

“Plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the defendant, Farm Storage & Equipment Company, Inc., for the sum of $112,918.67 plus interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from June 30, 1970, until paid, and an attorney’s fee of $5,000.00.”

LeBlanc v. Petroleum Equipment Tools Co.
· 1980-02-20
Workers compensation intervention (intervenor American Home Assurance Co.) Granted in part

“American Home is entitled to recover two-thirds of its intervention, $12,410.59, and no more.”

Attorney fee request (plaintiff’s attorney) Granted

“a fee of $4,136.86 assessed against American Home, is reasonable.”

United States v. Sepulveda
· 1983-07-12
Appeal (appellant Homero Sepulveda) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Thomas
· 1983-07-18
Appeal (appellants John H. Thomas and Lonnie D. Clark) Denied

“The judgment appealed from is AFFIRMED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 1007.5 days (N = 10).

The sampled closed cases were filed from 1983 through 1985 and included oilfield, industrial, insurance, and other civil disputes. The sample is too small and historically incomplete to support a career-wide caseload estimate.

A historical record

Judge Putnam no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.