🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Henry Alvan Mentz Jr.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana district Retired 2001 · served 1982–2001 Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 18 signed orders read

Judge Mentz no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Vastar Resources, Inc. v. Popich Bros. Water Transport, Inc.
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Vastar’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is GRANTED.”

J. Aron & Co. v. Cargill Marine Terminal, Inc.
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issues of Liability against American Commercial Barge Line is DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“American Commercial Barge Line Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED dismissing all claims”

Odeco Oil & Gas Co. v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Motion to Lift Stay and for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART as follows:”

Adams v. Shell Oil Co.
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“on the Issue of Exemplary Damages is GRANTED, dismissing all claims for exemplary damages”

Travelers Insurance v. St. Jude Hospital Complex Development Group, Inc.
Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff Travelers Insurance Company’s motion to quantify sanctions is GRANTED”

Adams v. Shell Oil Co.
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“on the Issue of Strict Liability is GRANTED, dismissing the plaintiffs’ claim of strict liability.”

Dempsey v. Arco Oil & Gas Co.
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“be and hereby is GRANTED.”

Doe v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“In view of the foregoing, plaintiffs’ motions to remand are GRANTED.”

Motions to stay (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Due to the granting of plaintiffs motion to remand, their alternative motions to stay the proceedings are moot.”

Brumfield v. Shelton
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania’s motion for reconsideration is GRANTED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“its motions for summary judgment on the issues of timely and adequate notice are GRANTED, thus dismissing Plaintiffs claim against it.”

Maggio v. Liztech Jewelry
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the defendants, Liztech Jewelry, Jill Elizabeth, and Donegal Mutual Insurance Company, is GRANTED, dismissing the plaintiffs’ suit for defamation.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiffs-in-eounterclaim, Liztech Jewelry and Jill Elizabeth, on their counterclaim for copyright infringement is DENIED.”

Great American Ins. Companies v. M/V Romeral
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The motion for partial summary judgment filed on behalf of plaintiff Great American Insurance Companies is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The motion for partial summary judgment filed on behalf of Compañía Sud Americana De Vapores S.A. d/b/a Chilean Line is GRANTED, finding that the carrier liability in this case is limited to $500.00 per package.”

Blanchard v. Collagen Corp.
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“IT IS ORDERED that defendant Collagen Corporations’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of federal preemption is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART dismissing all of plaintiffs claims as preempted except for strict liability and negligence based on contamination of the product.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

His docket was concentrated in the district's admiralty and maritime work (Jones Act, COGSA, offshore platforms) alongside oil-and-gas, products-liability, insurance, and Section 1983 civil-rights matters; a structured nature-of-suit enumeration was not drawn for this closed historical docket.

A historical record

Judge Mentz no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.