🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Henry George Templar

United States District Court for the District of Kansas district Retired 1988 · served 1962–1988 Appointed by John F. Kennedy (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Templar no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Templar decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Templar treated strict construction of published tariffs as necessary to protect the public interest.

“The* public interest demands that tariffs be strictly construed.”

He preserved a minor’s personal-injury claim under Kansas tolling law despite the ordinary limitations period.

“her cause of action was not barred by the Statute of Limitations”

Procedural preferences

He required parties to answer relevant discovery over objections and allowed a defined period for compliance.

“Defendant will be granted fifteen days’ time to respond to the request and to the interrogatories”

He declined to dismiss at the pleading stage when asserted government inducement remained factually disputed.

“At this stage of the proceedings the charges that defendant was misled by government agents are sharply denied by the government and cannot justify the sustaining of a motion to dismiss.”

Cautions

He rejected conclusory constitutional allegations unsupported by pleaded facts.

“These allegations are bald conclusions unsupported by allegations of facts, and are legally insufficient and may be denied without a hearing.”

He treated the exhaustion of available military remedies as a prerequisite to habeas relief.

“since he has not exhausted his remedies within the military court system, petitioner’s application must be denied.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Thomas v. Weinberger
398 F. Supp. 1034 · 1975-04-30
Summary judgment (Secretary) Denied

“the motion of defendant for summary judgment is de *1042 nied”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment is sustained.”

Deaton v. Britton
355 F. Supp. 597 · 1973-03-20
Civil rights complaint (plaintiff) Denied

“the action be dismissed;”

Motion to appoint counsel (plaintiff) Denied

“petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel be denied.”

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. John Sexton & Co.
339 F. Supp. 1202 · 1972-02-17
Summary judgment (plaintiff railroad) Granted

“plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is sustained;”

Summary judgment (defendant shipper) Denied

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment is overruled.”

United States v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
375 F. Supp. 962 · 1974-03-11
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“This motion is overruled.”

United States v. Hercules, Inc.
335 F. Supp. 102 · 1971-11-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss on the ground the alleged incident giving rise to this prosecution does not come within the purview of the Refuse Act is overruled.”

Motion to strike counts (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion to strike Counts 2 through 10, inclusive, is sustained.”

Willard v. Harris
336 F. Supp. 1228 · 1971-07-12
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“It is ordered that this action be dismissed.”

Fellers v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.
330 F. Supp. 1334 · 1971-07-16
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“this Court must grant defendant’s motion to dismiss.”

Dickson v. Hoffman
305 F. Supp. 1040 · 1969-11-05
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motion to dismiss should be denied.”

Citizens Environmental Council v. Volpe
364 F. Supp. 286 · 1973-01-03
Summary judgment (defendants and intervenors) Granted

“the motions of the defendants and the intervenors for summary judgment, be, and they are, sustained”

Stueve v. American Honda Motors Co., Inc.
448 F. Supp. 167 · 1978-03-29
Motion to limit recovery (defendants) Denied

“defendants’ motion to limit recovery must be denied.”

Edmonds v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company
315 F. Supp. 523 · 1970-05-26
Motion to reconsider appointment of counsel (defendant) Denied

“The motion of defendant to reconsider the Court’s order appointing counsel for the plaintiff is overruled and denied.”

Troyan v. United States Government
240 F. Supp. 383 · 1964-08-21
Application for writ of restrainment (petitioner) Denied

“the application be and is hereby dismissed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No electronic assigned-case cohort was available for caseload analysis.

A historical record

Judge Templar no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.