🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Raymond E. Patricco

United States District Court for the District of Idaho magistrate 2 signed orders read

How Judge Patricco decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Denies a Rule 59 motion to alter or amend the judgment, holding the movant to the narrow grounds for post-judgment relief.

“Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Dkt. 77) is DENIED.”

Cautions

Grants a defendant's motion for summary judgment where the record does not support the plaintiff's claims.

“For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 92) is GRANTED.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Scofield v. Guillard
3:22-cv-00521-REP · 2025-02-04
Motion to alter or amend judgment (defendant) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Dkt. 77) is DENIED.”

Rita v. Greensky Management Co.
1:23-cv-00044-REP · 2025-12-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 92) is GRANTED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed consent docket consists of twenty-three Social Security disability appeals and one employment and wage dispute decided on cross-motions for summary judgment. In consent cases under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Patricco enters final judgment rather than issuing a recommendation to a district judge.

Put Judge Patricco's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Patricco actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Patricco's own signed orders and cites them.