🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

John Simson Woolson

United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa district Retired 1899 · served 1892–1899 Appointed by Benjamin Harrison (Republican) 16 signed orders read

Judge Woolson no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Woolson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Woolson required creditors opposing discharge to identify concrete facts rather than repeat statutory language.

“But it is incumbent on the creditor to assert and prove the existence of facts sufficient, under the statute, io defeat discharge. On the creditor is the burden of proof.”

He confined criminal statutes to their legitimate scope even when state law could punish the alleged conduct.

“Criminal statutes are inelastic. The court may not attempt to stretch the statutory provisions beyond their legitimate boundaries”

Procedural preferences

He treated notice as essential before a prisoner could be removed to another district for trial.

“In my judgment, the prisoner should have an opportunity to be heard in the matter of the application, if he so desire.”

He allowed bankruptcy referees to determine proper attorney fees without first convening the creditors.

“I am of the opinion that notice to creditors is not required before the referee can settle proper attorney’s fees.”

Cautions

Woolson would not use habeas review to retry facts or reassess the weight of evidence decided by state tribunals.

“Por this court cannot, upon habeas corpus, consider the sufficiency and comparative weight of evidence as establishing guilt or innocence.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Jordan
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“I find, therefore, that under the allegations of the application petitioner could not obtain his release if the writ of habeas corpus were to issue.”

United States v. Adler
Demurrer (defendants) Denied

“the demurrer must be overruled; and it is so ordered.'”

United States Trust Co. of New York v. Omaha & St. L. Ry. Co.
Application for receiver instructions (receiver) Granted

“it is therefore and hereby accordingly ordered that whenever said receiver is served with notice of garnishment, or any other notice, writ, or process, issuing out of or pertaining to any of the courts of the state of Iowa”

United States v. Burnell
Motion in arrest of judgment (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment must be overruled. Ordered accordingly, and defendant excepts.”

Mississippi Coal & Ice Co. v. Ottumwa Belle
Exceptions to admiralty report (libelant) Denied

“It follows, from the foregoing, that all lie exceptions filed by libel-ant are overruled.”

In re Beshears
Application for removal (government) Moot / procedural

“the w'arrant of removal was refused until defendant had such notice”

United States v. Kuhl
Motion to quash indictment (defendant) Granted

“The motion to quash the indictment must he sustained.”

In re Tilden
Application for payment of taxes (bankrupt) Granted

“The conclusion reached is that the trustee pay, out of the funds of the estate, the taxes now outstanding and a lien against the homestead of the bankrupt. ' Ordered accordingly.”

In re Beck
Application for attorney fees (bankrupt’s counsel) Granted in part

“The conclusion reached is that the bill as rendered cannot be allowed; and yet there clearly appear legal services of benefit to the estate as rendered by such attorney, and personal expenses by him necessarily incurred in connection therewith, pending appointment, etc., of trustee, and after petition for adjudication was filed.”

In re Holman
Motion to strike objections (bankrupt) Granted

“The motion to strike out the specifications of grounds of opposition as filed by the- opposing creditor must be sustained.”

In re Thomas
Objections to discharge (creditor) Denied

“Therefore the objections to discharge, as .specified, must be overruled, and discharge granted.”

In re Stotts
Motion to refer fee application (counsel) Granted

“The pending matter is therefore referred back to Referee Lee, with directions to take such further action relating thereto as may be found right and just.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No electronic case-level docket exists for Woolson’s tenure. The profile therefore makes no claim about complete caseload mix, duration, administrative dispositions, or motion timing.

A historical record

Judge Woolson no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.