🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Martin Pence

United States District Court for the District of Hawaii district Retired 2000 · served 1961–2000 Appointed by John F. Kennedy (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Pence no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Pence decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Pence favored equitable statutory construction when a literal limitations rule would defeat a later-arising contribution right.

“The non-liability statute being a statute of limitations and therefore to be narrowly construed, must stand aside for the more equitable remedies of the Act.”

He treated materially inconsistent agency treatment of similar parties as arbitrary.

“There may not be a rule for Monday, another for Tuesday, a rule for general application, but denied outright in a specific case.”

Procedural preferences

A reconsideration request had to identify a valid reason to revisit the ruling and then justify changing it.

“A motion for reconsideration must do two things. First, it must demonstrate some reason why the court should reconsider its prior decision. Second, it must convince the court to reverse its prior decision.”

When disclosure implicated named individuals and financial information, he expressly balanced privacy against the public interest.

“This language makes it clear that when a balance must be struck between the competing interests of the privacy of individual citizens and the public’s right to knowledge concerning agency action, that balance clearly weighs in favor of the protection of privacy through withholding of the information regarding specific individuals.”

Cautions

He rejected reconsideration as a vehicle for legal theories that could have been raised before judgment.

“A motion for reconsideration is an improper vehicle to tender new legal theories not raised in opposition to summary judgment.”

He viewed sanctions authority as protecting the judicial process from abusive filings, even when the lawyer had sought bankruptcy protection.

“The interest of the governmental unit, here the Federal judiciary branch, is to keep the stream of federal litigation free from unnecessary and abusive legal obstructions.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Hawaii Press Newspapers, Inc. v. Mac Carthy
1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6550 · 1965-06-09
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction is granted.”

State of Washington v. American Pipe & Construction Co.
280 F. Supp. 802 · 1968-01-10
Summary judgment (defendant American Pipe & Construction Co.) Granted in part

“It is herewith ordered that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted insofar as it covers plaintiffs who have not identified any transactions, or have identified purchases only from named defendants with whom plaintiffs have heretofore settled.”

Albert v. Dietz
283 F. Supp. 854 · 1968-04-04
Motions to dismiss (third-party defendant County of Kauai) Denied

“The County of Kauai’s motion to dismiss is denied.”

Hawaii Yacht Club v. United States
301 F. Supp. 1150 · 1969-02-25
Tax refund claim (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, let judgment for the Defendant be entered.”

HC&D Moving & Storage Company v. United States
298 F. Supp. 746 · 1969-04-07
Petition for review (plaintiffs) Granted

“This court therefore vacates, annuls, and sets aside the Decision and Order of the Interstate Commerce Commission and remands this case for such further proceedings, including the taking of further evidence if necessary, as the Commission may deem necessary for its subsequent Decision and Order, in the light of our instant ruling.”

Hawaiian Telephone Co. v. Hawaii Department of Labor & Industrial Relations
1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7633 · 1974-07-12
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“TELCO’s prayer for a preliminary injunction is granted.”

Holland v. HEALY TIBBITTS CONSTRUCTION CO.
379 F. Supp. 192 · 1974-07-24
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether or no Holland was a seaman is DENIED.”

Save South Kona Coalition v. Dole
575 F. Supp. 277 · 1983-12-08
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of ripeness is GRANTED.”

Yuclan Enterprises, Inc. v. Nakagawa
583 F. Supp. 1574 · 1984-05-04
Motion to dissolve injunction (defendants) Granted

“The Motions to Dissolve the Injunction and Decree are hereby GRANTED.”

Sovereign Life Ins. Co. of California v. Rewald
601 F. Supp. 1489 · 1985-02-06
Summary judgment (plaintiff insurer) Granted

“Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Sovereign’s Motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is GRANTED.”

Siverts v. Craig
602 F. Supp. 50 · 1985-02-07
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted

“Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby GRANTED.”

Smith v. State Farm Insurance
615 F. Supp. 453 · 1985-08-15
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“It is ORDERED that Smith’s motion to remand be, and it hereby is, DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The available assigned-case metadata is dominated by bankruptcy appeals from the early 1990s and does not establish the distribution of Pence’s full career caseload.

A historical record

Judge Pence no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.