🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Jack Tarpley Camp Jr.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia district Retired 2010 · served 1988–2010 Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 22 signed orders read

Judge Camp no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Camp decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Camp required a party seeking protection from discovery to identify specific facts rather than rely on conclusory trade-secret claims.

“the movant must articulate specific facts to support its request and cannot rely on speculative or conclusory statements.”

He accepted proof of routine computerized mailing procedures as sufficient when the audit records showed the notices were generated without error.

“proof of routine, customary computerized procedures is sufficient to show adherence to such procedures.”

Procedural preferences

Camp enforced patent-disclosure deadlines rather than repeatedly extending discovery to cure late contentions.

“Enough time and money will eventually cure any prejudice caused by late disclosure of information, but that will not result in the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action.”

He expected parties to consult the local summary-judgment rules and treated properly unsupported fact responses according to those rules.

“Going forward, both parties should refer to the Local Rules prior to filing documents with the Court.”

Cautions

Camp imposed discovery expenses after finding that limited cooperation would have avoided the motion practice.

“At bottom, the record reveals that McKes-son took a lackadaisical approach to its obligations under Rule 26.”

He warned that an unresponsive party could be treated as abandoning a claim challenged in a motion.

“Because Plaintiff failed to respond to Defendants' argument regarding this claim, the Court deems it abandoned.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Estate of Manship v. United States
· 2006-12-20
Motion for protective order (third party) Denied

“Williamette’s motion for protective order [# 3] is DENIED.”

ChemFree Corp. v. J. Walter, Inc.
· 2007-10-29
Motions to strike (plaintiff) Granted in part

“For these reasons, Plaintiffs motion to strike [# 258] is GRANTED with respect to any reference in Defendant’s Third Amended Invalidity Contentions to Robb Bucklin, Glenn Knowlton, William Lashmett, Brent Lashmett, U.S. Patent 5,232,299, U.S. Patent 5,364,789, and U.S. Patent 5,427,128.”

Motion to preclude supplementation (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Lastly, Plaintiffs motion to preclude supplementation of Defendants’ invalidity contentions [# 233] is DENIED as moot.”

Morales Vilchez v. Arc Communities 17, LLC
· 2010-02-22
Summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“The Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [# 36].”

Yarnevic v. Apfel
· 2005-02-18
Motion for attorneys fees (plaintiff) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion for attorney fees [# 17] is GRANTED.”

Diamond Crystal Brands, Inc. v. Wallace
· 2008-05-15
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Granted

“The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration [# 22].”

Motion for oral argument (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“The Court DENIES as moot Plaintiffs Motion for Oral Argument [# 24]”

Orabi v. Chertoff
· 2007-12-27
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss [# 3], DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ Complaint [# 1], and DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case.”

Angel Flight of Georgia, Inc. v. Angel Flight Southeast, Inc.
· 2006-04-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Angel Flight Southeast, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment [# 54] is DENIED.”

Lee v. ETHAN ALLEN RETAIL, INC.
· 2009-07-28
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 91].”

Hursey v. Hursey
· 2010-02-12
Motion to add party (defendant) Denied

“The Court DENIES the Motion to Add Party [# 5] and GRANTS the Motion to Remand to State Court [# 21]”

Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted
Sierra Club v. Georgia Power Co.
· 2003-06-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“For the above stated reasons, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts IV and V of Plaintiffs’ Complaint [# 5-1] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Motion for extension of time (plaintiffs) Granted

“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Time to File Reply [# 6-1] is GRANTED.”

Motion for oral argument (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ Motion for Oral Argument on Motion to Dismiss [# 14-1] is DENIED.”

McKesson Information Solutions LLC v. Epic Systems Corp.
· 2007-06-26
Motions to compel (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Epic’s motion to compel discovery [# 44] is GRANTED.”

Request for attorneys fees (defendant) Granted

“Pursuant to 37(a)(4)(A), Defendant Epic’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs is GRANTED.”

Pope Ex Rel. Pope v. Cherokee County Bd. of Educ.
· 2006-05-29
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [# 16]. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs’ complaint.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The sampled historical cases included habeas, prisoner civil rights, Social Security, employment, contract, insurance, and products-liability matters. Most retained timelines were empty shells.

A historical record

Judge Camp no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.