🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Moxila A. Upadhyaya

United States District Court for the District of Columbia magistrate 22 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Carrigg v. Gallaudet University
· 2022-10-18
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Carrigg’s Motion to file a Second Amended Complaint”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“DENIES Gallaudet’s Motion to Dismiss without prejudice.”

Gibbs v. Kijakazi
· 2023-06-07
Motion for remand (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS the Commissioner’s Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand.”

Motion for judgment of reversal (claimant) Moot / procedural

“the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal.”

Coleman v. McAleenan
· 2022-12-01
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.”

Stanton v. Whitley
· 2022-11-14
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS the Corps’ motion for summary judgment, ECF 9.”

Kight v. Crunchy Tobacco, Inc.
· 2024-02-14
Motion for attorney fees (defendant) Granted in part

“Crunchy’s Petition for Attorneys’ Fees is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

Cabrera v. Mogoo, Inc.
· 2024-03-21
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Denied

“the Court DENIES Defendant ENB’s Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 96.”

Lapotsky v. McCarthy
· 2023-09-28
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS the Army’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 32.”

Lapotsky v. McCarthy
· 2023-11-08
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 40.”

Bunting v. District of Columbia CVS Pharmacy, LLC
· 2024-02-07
Motion to exclude expert testimony (plaintiffs) Denied

“the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion, ECF No. 45.”

Bunting v. District of Columbia CVS Pharmacy, LLC
· 2024-08-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS CVS’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47).”

Kight v. Crunchy Tobacco, Inc.
· 2025-03-25
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“the Court hereby recommends that Plaintiffs’ Motion be DENIED.”

Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
· 2025-03-13
Motion to stay enforcement (plaintiff) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Klayman’s Motion is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 175 days (N = 3).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 205 days (N = 9).

The random sample includes immigration-delay, employment, motor-vehicle, agricultural-review, and other civil matters, with both pending and terminated cases.

Put Judge Upadhyaya's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Upadhyaya actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Upadhyaya's own signed orders and cites them.