🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Joseph Charles McGarraghy

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (now U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia) district Deceased · served 1954–1967 Appointed by Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican) 20 signed orders read

Judge McGarraghy no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge McGarraghy decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He refused to infer an action against a federal board where Congress had specified a different private remedy.

“It does not confer upon the plaintiff any right or privilege-which the plaintiff is entitled to protect, by suit against the Board.”

He applied the written salary regulations to determine whether pharmacists qualified for the overtime exemption.

“Drug Fair did not pay its pharmacists a salary within the meaning of the Act.”

Cautions

He left a removal decision’s merits alone after concluding that the employee received the hearing and appeal the law provided.

“It is not for this court, at this date, to examine the merits of the grounds for his removal.”

He denied equitable relief where the claimant had an available legal remedy.

“the plaintiff must seek relief by its remedies at law.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Blue v. McKay
· 1955-06-24
Declaratory and injunctive claims (mineral-lease applicant) Denied

“the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief demanded.”

Jones v. Watson
· 1955-06-30
Patent application (patent applicant) Denied

“In view of the foregoing, the complaint will be dismissed.”

Evening Star Newspaper Co. v. Columbia Typographical Union No. 101
· 1955-09-03
Summary judgment (newspaper plaintiff) Granted

“the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be granted.”

United States v. O'CONNOR
· 1955-11-15
Motion for judgment of acquittal (criminal defendant) Denied

“The motion of the defendant for judgment of acquittal will be denied.”

Lamm v. Watson
· 1955-12-23
Patent application (patent applicants) Denied

“The complaints will be dismissed.”

Saggau v. Young
· 1956-01-25
Summary judgment (federal defendants) Granted

“the motion of the defendants for summary judgment will be granted.”

Hargett v. Summerfield
· 1956-02-06
Summary judgment (postmaster plaintiff) Denied

“The motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment is denied”

Summary judgment (federal defendants) Granted

“the cross-motion of the defendants for summary judgment is granted.”

May v. Wilson
· 1956-02-10
Preliminary injunction or temporary stay (servicemember plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction or a temporary stay order is denied.”

Dayton v. Dulles
· 1956-12-21
Summary judgment (Secretary of State) Granted

“The defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted”

Summary judgment (passport applicant) Denied

“the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be denied.”

Aircoach Transport Ass'n v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co.
· 1957-07-05
Summary judgment (air-carrier plaintiffs) Granted

“the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment except as to damages will be granted”

Day v. Wilson
· 1957-09-30
Habeas petition (military prisoner) Denied

“the prayers of the amended petition will be denied and the petition dismissed.”

Beck v. Watson
· 1958-02-25
Patent application (patent applicants) Denied

“plaintiffs’ application in suit does not show patentability over the prior art and the complaint will be dismissed.”

A historical record

Judge McGarraghy no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.