🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

James Robert Kirkland

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia district Deceased · served 1950–1958 Appointed by Harry S. Truman (Democratic) 20 signed orders read

Judge Kirkland no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Kirkland decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A contempt conviction required an unmistakable refusal after the committee clearly communicated what compliance required.

“anything short of a clear cut default on the part of the witness will not sustain a conviction for contempt of Congress.”

A witness’s admission of party membership did not by itself waive the privilege against answering questions about potentially incriminating activity.

“his admission of membership in the Communist Party does not constitute a waiver as defined in the Rogers case”

Cautions

He denied extraordinary relief when asserted harm remained speculative and administrative remedies had not been exhausted.

“An injunction is an extraordinary remedy and should not be granted unless necessary to protect rights against injuries otherwise irremediable.”

A subpoena could not override sovereign immunity where the foreign government controlled the company and formally asserted the privilege.

“sovereign- immunity is extended to Anglo-Iranian and the subpoena served upon this company is quashed.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Byrne v. Frank Cunningham Stores, Inc.
· 1950-03-27
Post trial motion (defendant) Denied

“Wherefore, the motion of the defendant is hereby denied, and the judgment as modified is affirmed.”

Burford v. Krause
· 1950-03-29
Motion for directed verdict (defendant landlord) Granted

“the Court accordingly directs a verdict in favor ef the defendant.”

In re Colohan
· 1950-11-08
Request for costs and fees (petitioner) Denied

“This Court finds that the justice of this-case requires that costs be apportioned so that the petitioner bear the expense of her counsel as well as the taxable cost of this, proceeding”

Decca Record Co. v. Marzall
· 1950-12-01
Patent application (patent applicants) Denied

“The complaint should be dismissed as to each of said claims 16 and 17 of Plaintiffs’ application Ser. No. 701,745.”

Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Marzall
· 1950-12-08
Trademark registration (trademark applicant) Denied

“this complaint is accordingly dismissed.”

United States v. Emspak
· 1951-01-26
Motion for bill of particulars (criminal defendant) Denied

“that portion of the motion seeking the same will be denied.”

United States v. Emspak
· 1951-01-31
Motions to dismiss (criminal defendants) Denied

“the several motions to dismiss are accordingly overruled.”

Barrett v. Young
· 1951-11-09
Injunction claim (plaintiff police officers) Denied

“the Complaint must be dismissed”

Temporary restraining order (plaintiff police officers) Moot / procedural

“the temporary restraining order must be dissolved.”

Republic of China v. Pang-Tsu Mow
· 1951-12-10
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“the motion to dismiss is overruled”

Preliminary injunction (Republic of China) Granted

“the preliminary injunction will be granted”

Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Jones
· 1951-12-10
Judgment enforcement claim (judgment creditor) Denied

“The complaint, therefore, must, be dismissed.”

Republic of China v. Pang-Tsu Mow
· 1951-12-14
Motions to strike (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“the plaintiff’s motion to strike certain portions of the defendants’ notice of appeal be and the same is hereby overruled.”

Orloff v. Lovett
· 1951-12-17
Habeas petition (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“this case shall be dismissed.”

A historical record

Judge Kirkland no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.