🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Burnita Shelton Matthews

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (now U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia) district Deceased · served 1950–1968 Appointed by Harry S. Truman (Democratic) 20 signed orders read

Judge Matthews no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Matthews decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

She treated the labor board’s statutory restriction on mixing professional and nonprofessional employees as mandatory.

“The Board has no statutory warrant to disregard this mandatory limitation upon its authority”

She found tax payment involuntary where official collection power left the taxpayer without equal bargaining footing.

“Plaintiff and defendant were not on terms of equality. Plaintiff was a mere taxpayer. Defendant was clothed with official authority”

Cautions

She declined to intervene in internal union affairs before the plaintiffs completed the organization’s own review process.

“Thus it is clear that plaintiffs have not exhausted their administrative remedies within the CIO.”

She expressly limited a subpoena ruling because the Air Force had not yet presented a privilege claim for decision.

“In the present posture of the instant matter no claim of privilege has been asserted or is being decided.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Durkin v. Murray
· 1950-02-06
Preliminary injunction (union plaintiffs) Denied

“The motion for a preliminary injunction will be denied”

Motions to dismiss (labor-organization defendants) Granted

“the motion to dismiss will be granted.”

Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Marzall
· 1950-03-22
Trademark registration (trademark applicant) Granted

“Plaintiff is entitled, according to law, to a decree authorizing the Commissioner of Patents to issue to the plaintiff certificates of registration under the seal of the United States Patent Office”

Kroll v. McGrath
· 1950-04-04
Summary judgment (government defendant) Granted

“The defendant’s Motion for summary judgment will be granted.”

S. S. W., Inc. v. Air Transport Ass'n
· 1950-05-31
Motions to dismiss (aviation-industry defendants) Granted

“The Motions to Dismiss are, therefore, hereby granted”

American Security & Trust Co. v. District of Columbia
· 1950-06-20
Motions to dismiss (District of Columbia) Denied

“The motion to dismiss the complaint will be denied.”

Gibson Wine Co. v. Snyder
· 1950-12-14
Preliminary injunction (wine-company plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“The preliminary injunction issued herein will be dissolved”

Permanent injunction (wine-company plaintiff) Denied

“the permanent injunction sought will be denied.”

Wallace v. Graff
· 1952-04-29
Trustee exemption petition (charitable trustee) Denied

“an order will be signed denying the petition of the trustee for exemption from Rule 22 of the Local Civil Rules”

United States v. Clark
· 1952-12-05
Motion for judgment of acquittal (criminal defendant) Denied

“The motion for .a judgment of acquittal is denied”

United States v. Carper
· 1953-01-14
Motion to change venue (criminal defendants) Denied

“The motion for a change of venue is denied without prejudice to its renewal if, upon .the voir dire examination, it appears that an impartial jury cannot be secured.”

Haymes v. Brownell
· 1955-05-31
Summary judgment (Attorney General) Denied

“The motion of the defendant for summary judgment will be denied”

Summary judgment (alien plaintiff) Granted

“the motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment will be granted.”

Webster-Chicago Corp. v. Holstensson
· 1955-06-20
Motions to dismiss (patentee defendant) Granted

“the court is convinced that a proper exercise of its discretion calls for the dismissal of the instant action”

Kyne v. Leedom
· 1956-12-19
Motion to dismiss or summary judgment (labor-board defendants) Denied

“defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment is denied”

Summary judgment (professional-employee plaintiff) Granted

“the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted”

A historical record

Judge Matthews no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.