🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Aubrey Eugene Robinson Jr.

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia district Deceased · served 1966–1992 Appointed by Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic) 23 signed orders read

Judge Robinson no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Robinson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He treated back pay and reinstatement as adequate remedies where temporary suspension would not frustrate labor arbitration.

“since back pay and re-instatement can in most instances provide complete relief.”

He protected deliberative drafts where disclosure risked chilling internal analysis and misleading the public about the agency’s final position.

“Release of the documents would likely stifle candid communication within the agency, lead to public confusion, and violate the integrity of the decision-making process.”

Cautions

He imposed sanctions where counsel omitted controlling adverse authority that was decisive of the position advanced.

“defendant’s failure to cite the cases was unreasonable and thus sanctionable under Rule 11.”

He required genuinely extraordinary circumstances for a late government appeal rather than ordinary internal mishandling.

“Because defendant’s explanation does not meet the standard of ‘excusable neglect,’ and because of the additional delay involved, Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File an Appeal is denied.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Sjogreen v. Reno
· 1996-10-17
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“For the reasons set forth hereafter, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED and the Petition is DISMISSED.”

Chemical Weapons Working Group v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
· 1999-01-19
Motions to compel (plaintiffs) Denied

“Accordingly, the Court will deny the motion to compel.”

Chacon-Castellanos v. Reno
· 1996-10-17
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“For the reasons set forth hereafter, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED and the Petition is DISMISSED.”

Leake v. Califano
· 1979-09-27
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED, that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED;”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

United States v. Smith
· 1978-05-30
Motion to reduce sentence (defendant) Moot / procedural

“ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence be and hereby is DENIED as moot.”

Cousin v. District of Columbia
· 1992-01-15
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED, that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED;”

Motion for sanctions (plaintiffs) Granted

“FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions against Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 is hereby GRANTED;”

American National Standards Institute v. Federal Trade Commission
· 1979-06-01
Motion for injunctive and declaratory relief (plaintiffs) Denied

“ORDERED, that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Permanent Injunction and Declaratory Judgment is hereby DENIED;”

Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“FURTHER ORDERED, that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED;”

Joseph v. Bond
· 1981-01-07
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ motion is granted.”

Doe v. Webster
· 1991-06-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“In conclusion, Doe has substantiated his claim that he is entitled to substantive and procedural due process. As a result, his cross-motion for summary judgment must be granted and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment must be denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted
United States v. Gerrity
· 1978-06-09
Motion for discovery and inspection (defendant) Granted in part

“ORDERED, that Defendant’s Motion for Discovery and Inspection be and hereby is granted in part and denied in part, as described below.”

Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc. v. Schlesinger
· 1979-05-16
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“ORDERED, that Defendants’ Motion is granted and this action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”

PLAYERS ASS'N v. National Football League
· 1989-09-18
Preliminary injunction (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs' motion is therefore denied.”

A historical record

Judge Robinson no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.