🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Alfred Adams Wheat

Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (now U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia) district Deceased · served 1929–1941 Appointed by Herbert Hoover (Republican) 5 signed orders read

Judge Wheat no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Wheat decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He read ordinary statutory and contractual terms by their common meaning rather than parsing them narrowly.

“There is no use in quibbling over the meaning of the words ‘abandon’ and ‘abandonment.’ They are words in common use and their meaning is well understood.”

Cautions

He drew a firm line between the wisdom of legislation, which he left to Congress, and its constitutionality, which he was willing to enforce even against an Act of Congress.

“These matters, however, seem to me to involve questions of wisdom and propriety rather than of power and to be for the consideration of the Congress rather than of the courts.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Alton Railroad v. Railroad Retirement Board
· 1933-07-01
Injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“A decree will be made in favor of the plaintiffs, granting the relief prayed for in the bill.”

Henning v. Public Utilities Commission
· 1935-07-01
Bill in equity (plaintiff) Denied

“I think that the Public Utilities Commission had jurisdiction and that the Order attacked in the bill was a valid exercise of that jurisdiction. The bill must, therefore, be dismissed.”

United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
· 1935-07-01
Action on bond (plaintiff) Denied

“That the provision in the bond quoted in the findings of fact No. 2 was a condition precedent to liability and failure to give the notice bars recovery on the bonds.”

French v. Squire
· 1935-07-01
Bill in equity (plaintiff) Denied

“they are in no position now in equity to assert superior title to the people who bought these notes in good faith, and in the belief they were properly issued.”

Capital Transit Co. v. Hazen
· 1937-11-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment should be affirmed.”

A historical record

Judge Wheat no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.