🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Alexander Holtzoff

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (now U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia) district Deceased · served 1945–1967 Appointed by Harry S. Truman (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Holtzoff no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Holtzoff decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A conflicting administrative record remained sufficient when the agency resolved the medical disagreement and its decision was supported by substantial evidence.

“Its decision is supported by substantial evidence.”

He treated reliance on uncross-examined witness statements as a fundamental defect when the proceeding involved a serious falsification charge.

“it was an error that went to the very roots of a fair hearing to introduce ex parte statements of witnesses as part of the evidence against the plaintiff.”

Cautions

He would not restrain publication merely because the underlying information may have been obtained improperly, absent a distinct property or copyright basis.

“The courts may not review the manner in which a newspaper man obtains his information and may not restrain the publication of news merely because the person responsible for the publication obtained it in a manner that may perhaps be illegal or immoral.”

He declined to narrow clear statutory immunity based on policy concerns, leaving any correction to Congress.

“if a statute is unambiguous, there is no room for construction.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Pearson
· 1966-12-20
Preliminary injunction (plaintiffs) Denied

“The motion for preliminary injunction is denied.”

Harrell v. Board of Commissioners of District of Columbia
· 1967-06-22
Application for three judge court (plaintiff) Denied

“the application for the convening of a Three-Judge Court is denied”

Smith v. Board of Commissioners of District of Columbia
· 1966-10-07
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“The defendants’ motion is granted.”

Byram v. Vaughn
· 1946-12-16
Preliminary injunction (employer) Denied

“Motion for a perliminary injunction denied.”

Hemans v. Matthews
· 1946-09-26
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“I shall dismiss the writ.”

Folks v. Celebrezze
· 1965-09-20
Summary judgment (government) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Cross-motion for summary judgment is denied.”

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks
· 1965-09-30
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s cross-motion is granted.”

In re Estate of Jones
· 1966-10-26
Claim for spousal allowance (estate of surviving spouse) Denied

“if the surviving spouse dies before receiving the allowance, the right to its payment is lost”

Thompson v. National Press Corp.
· 1966-05-06
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The motion made by the defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company for summary judgment is granted.”

Gamage v. Zuckert
· 1966-09-30
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motion is denied.”

In re Ford Home Furnishings Co.
· 1967-09-21
Petition for review (creditor) Denied

“the petition for review should be dismissed.”

In re Estate of Parnell
· 1967-09-27
Objections to administrator account (heir) Denied

“The objections to the administrator’s account are overruled.”

A historical record

Judge Holtzoff no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.