Alan Kay
Judge Kay no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“ORDERED that Non-Party KMK’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas [45] is denied in part, with regard to the subpoenas issued to attorneys Benny L. Kass, Mark M Mitek, Brian L. Kass, Laurie Pyne O’Reilly, and the Custodian of Records for KMK, and granted in part, with regard to the subpoena directed to John Brillian, Esq.”
“Accordingly, this Court grants Judgment Creditor’s Motion for Examination of Judgment Debtor in Aid of Enforcement [55] and denies Parkside’s Cross-Motion to Quash the subpoenas [58].”
“Accordingly, Plaintiff Motion for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference is granted.”
“For the reasons set forth in above, Defendant’s Motion to Compel [9] is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s request to supplement the administrative record with the July 22, 2014 Psychiatric Evaluation [9-7] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s requests to supplement the administrative record with all other exhibits are DENIED.”
“For the reasons stated above, the Court grants in part and denies in part Petitioner’s Amended Motion to Compel [3] and denies Respondent’s Motion to Quash [5].”
“Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Judgment and Quash Writ of Execution should be denied on this grounds.”
“Because Plaintiff’s Motion [34] seeks relief that is not set forth in the Complaint from a party that is not named as a defendant, Plaintiff’s Motion must be denied.”
“For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum Opinion, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel [47] is denied.”
“For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum Opinion, Defendant’s Motion to Compel [81] is granted in part and denied in part. Request 15 is granted. Requests 16, 18-22, 26, and 27 are denied.”
“For the reasons stated above, the undersigned grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [11] and grants in part and denies in part Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment [14].”
“For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [10] is granted in part and denied in part and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [12] is granted in part and denied in part.”
“ORDERED that, due to the unique circumstances presented in this case, the PRT’s Motion is GRANTED;”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 278 days (N = 6).
The randomized historical sample contains federal tort, Miller Act, personal-injury, and motor-vehicle matters. All six sampled cases were terminated.
A historical record
Judge Kay no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.