🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

William Homer Timbers

U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut district Deceased · served 1960–1971 Appointed by Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican) 33 signed orders read

Judge Timbers no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Timbers decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He enforced labor-arbitration relief when the remedy remained rooted in the parties' collective-bargaining agreement.

“the award was within the province of the arbitrator— ‘it draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement’”

He read the naturalization statute's disability exemption to cover a physical condition that generally prevented learning English.

“if petitioner shows that he has a physical disability which renders him generally incapable of learning to understand the English language, he comes within the exemption set forth in the proviso.”

Cautions

He would not enforce a towage disclaimer that attempted to eliminate liability for the tower's own negligence.

“federal law is clear that public policy forbids a tower to contract away liability for its own negligent towage.”

He declined to stay parallel federal litigation merely for convenience where doing so could dilute access to federal discovery.

“Of chief importance here is the protection of plaintiff’s right to institute parallel actions in the state and federal courts in order to avail himself of the broad federal discovery proceedings.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Avco Corp. (Lycoming Division) v. Local 1010 of International Union, UAW
· 1968-06-26
Motions to remand (plaintiff employer) Granted

“ORDERED that the motion by plaintiff Avco Corporation (Lycoming Div.) to remand this action to the Superior Court for Fairfield County be, and it hereby is, granted.”

DiMeo v. Minster Machine Co.
· 1963-07-09
Motions to dismiss (defendant Minster Machine) Denied

“Ordered that defendant Minster’s motion to dismiss the second count of the complaint be, and the same hereby is, denied,”

Motions to dismiss (defendant Ross Operating Valve) Granted

“Ordered that the motion of defendant Ross Operating Valve Co., Inc. to dismiss the complaint against said defendant be, and the same hereby is, granted.”

Universal Oil Products Co. v. SCM Corp.
· 1970-05-08
Motion to stay pending arbitration (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that all proceedings herein be, and the same hereby are, stayed pending the conclusion of arbitration pursuant to paragraph 9 of the purchase order of March 7, 1968.”

Motions to transfer (defendant) Moot / procedural

“it is not necessary to reach defendant’s alternative motion for a transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (1964) ;”

Electric Specialty Co. v. Local 1069, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
· 1963-07-05
Summary judgment (plaintiff employer) Denied

“Ordered that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, denied;”

Summary judgment (defendant union) Granted

“Ordered that defendant’s motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, granted;”

McCormick v. Labelle
· 1960-12-09
Motion for judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment is denied and the action is dismissed.”

United States v. McFaddin Express, Inc.
· 1961-07-08
Summary judgment (United States) Denied

“Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied, but with ■leave to renew the motion at such time as answers have been filed by defendants Gulf Oil Corporation and Tire Service and Sales Incorporated or judgments by ■default have been obtained against said ■defendants.”

Norkin v. S/T The Sister Katingo
· 1962-02-01
Motion to intervene (waterfront-property claimants) Denied

“They may not now intervene.”

United States ex rel. Frederick v. Kenton
· 1962-02-01
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Since no facts are set forth in support of the claim of a defective warrant, and there is no claim of denial of the right of appearance or of an insufficient hearing at the appearance required by 18 U.S.C. § 4207, the petition is dismissed.”

Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (petitioner) Denied

“Petitioner’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, for appointment of counsel and for issuance of subpoenas are denied.”

Motion to appoint counsel (petitioner) Denied
Motion for subpoenas (petitioner) Denied
United States ex rel. Saunders v. Reincke
· 1962-04-05
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Accordingly, petitioner’s sixth petition in this Court for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.”

Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (petitioner) Denied

“His motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel likewise are denied.”

Motion to appoint counsel (petitioner) Denied
United States v. Gable
· 1963-04-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied;”

Motion to substitute party (United States) Granted

“plaintiff’s motion to substitute defendant’s administratrix as party defendant is granted.”

Gomes v. United States
· 1963-06-27
Motion to vacate sentence (petitioner) Denied

“Accordingly, petitioner’s application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied.”

Local 12298, District 50 United Mine Workers of America v. Bridgeport Gas Co.
· 1963-02-06
Summary judgment (plaintiff union) Denied

“Ordered that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, denied;”

Summary judgment (defendant employer) Granted

“Ordered that summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, granted in favor of defendant.”

A historical record

Judge Timbers no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.