🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Robert Palmer Anderson

U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut district Deceased · served 1954–1964 Appointed by Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Anderson no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Anderson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He treated the patents themselves, rather than the royalty agreement, as the property producing the disputed income.

“But the patents, not the contract, constitute ‘the tree’.”

He found cosmetic product changes insufficient where ordinary purchasers would still perceive deceptive similarity.

“reliance should not be placed upon minor changes which do not essentially alter the deceptive similarity of the appearance of the knives to the ordinary purchaser who does not have the plaintiff’s knife and the defendants’ model side by side for comparison.”

Cautions

He limited temporary labor relief so administrative delay would not turn a preliminary board conclusion into a permanent disposition.

“The Board cannot by indefinite delay and a refusal to exercise its jurisdiction compel the court to transmute the Board’s conclusion, based merely upon a preliminary investigation, into what is tantamount to a permanent disposition of the labor union jurisdictional question.”

He emphasized federal equitable restraint where state courts could preserve the asserted rights.

“Whatever rights appellee may have are to be pursued through the state courts.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Cochran v. United States
· 1954-08-30
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“The motion for summary judgment is denied.,”

Jeffe v. Monarch Life Ins.
· 1954-08-16
Summary judgment (defendant insurer) Granted

“The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted”

Elm City Broadcasting Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
· 1954-09-10
Petition for injunctive review (plaintiff) Denied

“The temporary order for the stay of the Trial Examiner’s hearing is terminated and the plaintiff’s petition and complaint are dismissed.”

In re Glen Haven Estates, Inc.
· 1954-08-30
Bankruptcy review petition (mechanic's lien claimant) Denied

“It is ordered that the Referee’s order be affirmed and that the petition for review be dismissed.”

Brennan v. United States
· 1954-10-04
Motions to dismiss (United States) Granted

“The motion to dismiss is, therefore, granted and judgment may enter for the defendant.”

Sigona v. Slusser
· 1954-10-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“The motion to dismiss is denied.”

Harris v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
· 1954-10-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant utility) Granted

“The motion to dismiss is granted.”

In re Frederick Speier Footwear Corp.
· 1955-03-17
Bankruptcy review petition (trustee) Denied

“The order of the Referee is affirmed and the petition is dismissed.”

Electric Pipe Line, Inc. v. Fluid Systems, Inc.
· 1955-05-12
Declaratory patent and competition claims (plaintiff) Denied

“The plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed.”

Patent infringement counterclaim (defendant) Granted

“Judgment may enter for the defendant on its counterclaims to have an accounting for damages suffered and its costs, and for a permanent injunction against the plaintiff and all those in privity with it from further infringing Patent #2,224,403.”

Motion for new trial (plaintiff) Denied

“The motion for a new trial is denied.”

Petroleum Conversion Corp. v. Vaughan
· 1955-08-17
Petition for leave to sue on probate bond (plaintiff) Denied

“Permission for Petroleum Conversion Corporation to bring an action against James A. Vaughan and Edward A. Rogers on the probate bond filed in connection with the sale of real estate from the estate of Elizabeth Boyd Vaughan, deceased, is denied.”

Maryland Ex Rel. Thompson v. EIS Automotive Corp.
· 1956-10-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“The first count of the present action is not barred by the Statute of Limitations and the Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.”

Electric Pipe Line, Inc. v. Fluid Systems, Inc.
· 1956-12-04
Objections to special master report (plaintiff) Denied

“each and every objection to the Master’s reports, filed October 15, 1956, raised by the plaintiff or the defendant is overruled.”

Objections to special master report (defendant) Denied

A historical record

Judge Anderson no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.