🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Mosher Joseph Blumenfeld

U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut district Deceased · served 1961–1988 Appointed by John F. Kennedy (Democratic) 23 signed orders read

Judge Blumenfeld no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Blumenfeld decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He required a concrete, non-speculative injury to establish federal standing.

“In sum, Minor’s alleged injury is too generalized, speculative and remote to justify standing in this case.”

Cautions

He granted employment summary judgment where the plaintiff could not substantiate pretext beyond evidence of qualifications.

“she has offered no substantial evidence indicating that the defendant’s explanation of its actions was a pretext for unlawful discrimination on the basis of Ms. Graham’s age.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Willocks v. Dodenhoff
· 1986-06-24
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“On May 20,-1986, following a hearing on this motion, the court ruled in open court that this motion for summary judgment was granted in favor of all defendants in this case.”

Motion for reconsideration (plaintiffs) Denied

“The plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of that ruling, filed after the hearing, is hereby denied.”

Wingfield v. United Technologies Corp.
· 1988-02-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion, for summary judgment is granted.”

Motion in limine (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant’s motion in limine is granted in part and denied in part.”

Mitchell v. City of Hartford
· 1986-05-29
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“After having considered these objections, the court hereby grants summary judgment in favor of the Hartford defendants with respect to plaintiff’s claims relating to the 1976 search of plaintiff’s house, the 1979 arrest' and imprisonment, and the 1982 automobile searches and seizures. Summary judgment is denied with respect to the 1981 murder arrest incident, and the 1981 drug arrest incident, as described in this opinion.”

Hall v. Ashland Oil Co.
· 1986-01-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For that reason, the motion of Ashland Oil for Summary Judgment is hereby denied.”

Tillett v. Carlin
· 1986-05-16
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“In light of all the foregoing and consistent with the analysis in Tillett I, the defendant’s motion, which will be treated as a motion for summary judgment, is granted.”

Minor v. Mahoney
· 1986-10-15
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“Therefore, Maho-ney’s and Celebrate Life’s motion for summary judgment is hereby granted, and Minor’s motion for summary judgment is denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied
Motion to compel discovery (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff Minor’s motion to compel discovery is moot because she has no standing to sue.”

Motion to dismiss third party complaint (third-party defendant) Moot / procedural

“Similarly, the Town of Bristol’s motion to dismiss the third-party complaint brought against it by Mahoney and Celebrate Life is moot because it was based on an indemnity theory; since Mahoney and Celebrate Life were successful on summary judgment, they have no indemnity claim against the Town as a third-party defendant.”

Motion for contempt (defendants) Moot / procedural

“Finally, the motion for contempt against the nonparty witness Gayle Brooks is moot because her deposition is no longer needed.”

Kelsey v. Sheraton Corp.
· 1986-08-18
Summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“Having considered the defendants’ motion for summary judgment de novo upon *15 plaintiff’s objection to the magistrate’s recommended ruling, the motion for summary judgwent is denied”

Clute v. Davenport Co.
· 1988-01-26
Motion to compel discovery (defendants) Denied

“Accordingly the court must refuse the defendants their requested relief. Motion denied.”

Graham v. Renbrook School
· 1988-07-21
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment must be granted.”

DiMartino v. City of Hartford
· 1986-05-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Therefore, the motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Andreo v. Friedlander, Gaines, Cohen, Rosenthal & Rosenberg
· 1987-05-12
Motion for judgment on pleadings (defendant) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, Friedlander Gaines’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted in part and denied in part.”

Bauer v. Johns-Manville Corp.
· 1984-06-07
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the motion for summary judgment is denied and the motion to dismiss is granted as to the plaintiff’s claim for loss of consortium resulting from death.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

A historical record

Judge Blumenfeld no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.