🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Terry J. Hatter Jr.

United States District Court for the Central District of California district Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 5 signed orders read

How Judge Hatter decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Decides agency-action and insurance-coverage disputes on summary judgment by methodically running the Celotex burden-shifting framework (prima facie case, then shift to the non-movant to raise a triable issue) and resolves them with terse decretal '...be, and hereby is, Granted/Denied' paragraphs.

“Perez v. City National: 'the moving party has the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case ... If the Secretary satisfies his burden, the burden shifts to City National to introduce evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue.'”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Fragosa v. Moore
17 F. Supp. 3d 985 · 2014-04-28
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“It is Ordered that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, Granted.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“It is further Ordered that Defendants's motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, Denied.”

Perez v. City National Corp.
176 F. Supp. 3d 945 · 2016-04-05
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“It is Ordered that the Secretary's motion for partial summary judgment be, and hereby is, Granted.”

Nosrati v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co.
383 F. Supp. 3d 990 · 2019-04-16
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“It is Ordered that Provident's motion to establish ERISA application and for dismissal of state law claims be, and hereby is, Denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“It is further Ordered that Nosrati's motion for an order that this matter is not governed by ERISA be, and hereby is, Granted.”

Benchmark Insurance Co. v. Dismon Corp.
262 F. Supp. 3d 991 · 2017-08-16
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“It is Ordered that Benchmark's motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, Granted as to Benchmark's first claim -- rescission of the 2010, 2011, and 2012 Policies. ... Granted as to Benchmark's second claim -- a judicial declaration that it does not have a duty to defend or indemnify ...”

Olvera v. Gonzales
834 F. Supp. 2d 944 · 2011-05-20
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice because it is successive, petitioner did not obtain the requisite authorization from the Court of Appeals to file a successive petition, and this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider it.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed 2026 matters include alien-detainee habeas petitions, copyright suits involving alleged BitTorrent activity, and commercial contract and corporate disputes. Every reviewed docket remained pending, so no case-duration figures are available from this set.

Put Judge Hatter's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Hatter actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Hatter's own signed orders and cites them.