Autumn D. Spaeth
How Judge Spaeth decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
On an extradition request, she applies the probable-cause standard and certifies extraditability when competent evidence supports the requesting country's charges; federal law assigns that decision directly to the magistrate judge.
“The Court finds probable cause exists to support certifying the extradition of Relator.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand.”
“The Court finds probable cause exists to support certifying the extradition of Relator. The Court will issue a separate order certifying Prudencio Segura Castillo for extradition to Mexico on the charges of sexual abuse against V.R.S.”
“The decision of the Social Security Commissioner is AFFIRMED”
“Social Security is affirmed, and this action is dismissed with prejudice.”
“decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed, and this action is dismissed with prejudice.”
“Social Security is reversed, and the matter is remanded”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 383 days (N = 2).
Median motion-to-ruling time: 190 days (N = 2).
Her consent caseload is dominated by Social Security disability appeals. She also decides extradition matters assigned by statute, handles other civil cases by consent, and shares responsibility for immigration-detention habeas petitions.
Put Judge Spaeth's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Spaeth actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Spaeth's own signed orders and cites them.