IRS grants a tax-exempt-owned LLC late elections to be taxed as a corporation and to opt out of tax-exempt controlled entity status
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An LLC owned entirely by four Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations
missed two related tax elections it needed for a building-rehabilitation
investment. First, it was supposed to elect (on Form 8832) to be treated as a
corporation rather than a partnership. Second, as a corporation controlled by
tax-exempt owners, it needed a Section 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election to opt out of
"tax-exempt controlled entity" status, which otherwise forces slower
depreciation on rehabilitation property and can reduce the value of the
Section 47 rehabilitation credits the project was expected to generate. Its
advisors filed the tax return as if both elections had been made, then
discovered the elections were never actually filed. The LLC asked for relief
under the Section 301.9100-3 regulations, which let the IRS extend the deadline
for a missed regulatory election when the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith and the government is not prejudiced. The IRS found the LLC reasonably
relied on its tax professionals and granted 120 days from the date of the
letter to file both elections. The ruling does not bless the rehabilitation
credits themselves or the underlying investment.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should a tax-exempt-owned LLC get more time to file a late entity-classification election (to be taxed as a corporation) and a late Section 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election (to avoid tax-exempt controlled entity treatment)?
- Outcome: Approved. 120-day extension granted for both elections.
- Key authorities: IRC § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii); Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-7T
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202551001
Release Date: 12/19/2025
Index Number: 168.00-00, 7701.00-00, 9100.00-00, 9100.04-00, 9100.31-00
Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
-----------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:PT&E:B03
PLR-101120-25
Date:
September 18, 2025
LEGEND
X = -----------------------------------
-----------------------
A = ----------------------------------------
-----------------------
B = ---------------------------
-----------------------
C = -------------------------------------
-----------------------
D = -----------------------------------
-----------------------
State = ------------
Partnership = ---------------------------
-----------------------
Agreement = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Project = --------------------------
Advisor 1 = -----------------------------
Advisor 2 = ---------------------------------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = ----------------
Tax Year = -------------------------------------------------------
Dear --------------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated December 9, 2024, submitted on behalf of X
by its authorized representatives, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of
the Procedure and Administration Regulations (1) to file an election under § 301.7701-3
to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, and (2) to make an election under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) of the Internal Revenue
Code (“Code”) to not be treated as a tax-exempt controlled entity effective for Tax Year.
FACTS
Based on the information submitted, X is a State limited liability company formed
on Date 1. X has been classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes since Date 1.
Pursuant to its operating agreement, X was required to make an election to be treated
as an association taxable as a corporation for federal tax purposes (“entity classification
election”). X intended to make the entity classification election effective Date 2.
However, X failed to file Form 8832, Entity Classification Election, electing to be
classified as an association taxable as a corporation for federal tax purposes effective
Date 2.
A, B, C, and D, tax-exempt entities described under § 501(c)(3), own 100 percent
of X. X is a limited partner of Partnership. Partnership owns entities engaged in
projects to rehabilitate buildings, including Project, which was placed in service during
the Tax Year. The projects are expected to generate rehabilitation credits under § 47.
Under Section 5.3 of Partnership’s Agreement, X was required to make an election
under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) to not be treated as a tax-exempt controlled entity
(“§ 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election”). To make the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election, X was required to
be an association taxable as a corporation.
X represents that it intended to make a § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election effective for the
Tax Year. X emailed Advisor 1 and Advisor 2 that X intended to file the entity
classification and the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) elections (the “elections”). Advisor 2 prepared
and timely filed X’s Federal income tax return for Tax Year as if the elections were duly
and properly made.
After X’s tax return for Tax Year was filed, Advisor 2 discovered that Advisor 1
and Advisor 2 inadvertently failed to file the elections due to a misunderstanding of
Taxpayer’s email. The next day, X engaged Advisor 1 to request this letter ruling.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 167(a) provides that there shall be allowed as a depreciation deduction a
reasonable allowance for the exhaustion, wear and tear, and obsolescence of property
used in the trade or business, or in the production of income. The depreciation
deduction determined under § 167(a) for tangible property placed in service after 1986
generally is determined under § 168. Under § 168(g)(1)(B), the alternative depreciation
system (rather than the general depreciation system) must be used for any tax-exempt
use property, as defined in § 168(h).
Section 168(h)(6)(A) provides that, for purposes of § 168(h), if any property
which (but for this subparagraph) is not tax-exempt use property is owned by a
partnership having a tax-exempt entity and a non-exempt entity as partners and any
allocation to the tax-exempt entity is not a qualified allocation, then an amount equal to
the tax-exempt entity’s proportionate share of such property is treated as tax-exempt
use property.
Section 168(h)(6)(F)(i) provides generally that any tax-exempt controlled entity is
treated as a tax-exempt entity for purposes of §§ 168(h)(5) and (6). Under
§ 168(h)(6)(F)(iii)(I), a “tax-exempt controlled entity” means any corporation (without
regard to that subparagraph and § 168(h)(2)(E)) if more than 50 percent (in value) of the
corporation’s stock is held by one or more tax-exempt entities (other than a foreign
person or entity).
Under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii), a tax-exempt controlled entity can elect not to be treated
as a tax-exempt controlled entity for purposes of §§ 168(h)(5) and (6). Such an election
is irrevocable and will bind all tax-exempt entities holding an interest in the tax-exempt
controlled entity.
Under § 301.9100-7T(a)(1), a § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election must be made in
accordance with the rules provided in §§ 301.9100-7T(a)(2) and (3).
Under § 301.9100-7T(a)(2)(i), the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election must be made by the
due date of the tax return for the first taxable year for which the election is to be
effective. Section 301.9100-7T(a)(3) provides the manner in which the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii)
election is made.
Section 301.7701-3(a) provides that a business entity that is not classified as a
corporation under §§ 301.7701-2(b)(1), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7) or (8) (an eligible entity) can
elect its classification for federal tax purposes. An eligible entity with at least two
members can elect to be classified as either an association (and thus a corporation
under § 301.7701-2(b)(2)) or a partnership. Elections are necessary only when an
eligible entity does not want to be classified under the default classification or when an
eligible entity chooses to change its classification.
Section 301.7701-3(b)(1) provides that except as provided in § 301.7701-3(b)(3),
unless the entity elects otherwise, a domestic eligible entity is (i) a partnership if it has
two or more members; or (ii) disregarded as an entity separate from its owners if it has
a single owner.
Section 301.7701-3(c)(1) provides, in part, that an eligible entity may elect to be
classified other than as provided under § 301.7701-3(b), or to change its classification,
by filing Form 8832, Entity Classification Election, with the service center designated on
Form 8832.
Section 301.7701-3(c)(1)(iii) provide that this election will be effective on the date
specified by the entity on Form 8832 or on the date filed if no such date is specified.
The date specified on Form 8832 cannot be more than 75 days prior to the date on
which the election is filed and no more than 12 months after the date the election is
filed.
Section 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as including any
election the due date for which is prescribed by a regulation. Because the due date of
the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election is prescribed in § 301.9100-7T, the election is a regulatory
election. In addition, because the due date of the entity classification election is
prescribed in § 301.7701-3(c), the election is a regulatory election.
Under § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief will be granted when the
taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to
establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the
Government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—
(i) Requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is
discovered by the Service;
(ii) Failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the
taxpayer’s control;
(iii) Failed to make the election because, after exercising due diligence, the
taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election;
(iv) Reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or
(v) Reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the professional
failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Under § 301.9100-3(b)(3), a taxpayer is considered to have not acted reasonably
and in good faith if the taxpayer—
(i) Seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty
could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief,
and the new position requires a regulatory election for which relief is
requested;
(ii) Was fully informed of the required election and related tax consequences,
but chose not to file the election; or
(iii) Uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the
original deadline that make the election advantageous to the taxpayer, the
Service will not ordinarily grant relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Service will grant a reasonable
extension of time only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by
the granting of the relief. Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the
Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower
tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the
taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made. Under § 301.9100-
3(c)(1)(ii), the interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in
which the regulatory election should have been made, or any taxable year affected by
the election had it been timely made, are closed by the period of limitations on
assessment under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief
under § 301.9100-3.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that
X satisfied the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3. As a result, we grant X
an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to file Form 8832 with the
appropriate service center to elect to be treated as an association taxable as a
corporation for federal tax purposes effective Date 2. A copy of this letter should be
attached to the Form 8832.
In addition, based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made,
we conclude that X satisfied the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 for
granting an extension of time to file a § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election. X is granted an
extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to file the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii)
election statement with its Form 1120 for the Tax Year containing the information
required under § 301.9100-7T(a)(3) for the election to be effective for the Tax Year. X
must attach a copy of this letter to the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election statement. In addition,
pursuant to § 301.9100-7T(a)(3)(ii), a copy of this letter and the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii)
election statement must be attached to the federal income tax returns of A, B, C and D.
These rulings are contingent on X filing all required returns for all relevant years
consistent with the requested relief granted in this letter. A copy of this letter should be
attached to any such returns for the taxable years affected. Alternatively, if X files its
returns electronically, it may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to its
returns that provides the date and control number of this letter.
Except as provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning the tax
consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this
letter. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax
consequences of X’s investment in Partnership, including whether the projects were
eligible for the rehabilitation credits. In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the
granting of an extension of time for making an election is not a determination that the
taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election.
We express no opinion concerning interest, additions to tax, additional amounts
or penalties with respect to any taxable year that may be affected by these rulings. For
example, we express or imply no opinion as to whether a taxpayer is entitled to relief
from any penalty on the basis that the taxpayer had reasonable cause for failure to
timely file any income tax or information returns.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the requested rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
These rulings are directed only to the taxpayer requesting them. Section
6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that they may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter to X’s authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates)
By: _______________________________
Elizabeth V. Zanet
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates)
Enclosure:
Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes
cc: -------------------
-------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
----------------------------------
--------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.