🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202539002 Released September 26, 2025 Denied

Estate denied relief that would undo prior GST allocation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple made a pre-2001 gift to a descendants' trust and elected to split the gift, but their accounting firm omitted the transfer from their gift tax returns and did not allocate GST exemption. After one spouse died, the executor affirmatively allocated the decedent's remaining GST exemption to a separate GST-exempt marital trust on the estate tax return. The estate later sought to allocate some of that exemption retroactively to the earlier lifetime gift. The IRS denied relief because doing so would require reducing an affirmative GST allocation already made on the estate tax return. None of the regulation's three narrow exceptions allowing such a change applied, so the otherwise irrevocable allocation could not be shifted.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the estate retroactively allocate GST exemption to an omitted lifetime gift when that would reduce a later affirmative allocation to a marital trust?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2631(b), 2632, 2642(g); Treas. Reg. § 26.2642-7(e)(2)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202539002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/26/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2642.07-00, 2632.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------- -------------------, ID No. -----------------
-------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------- --------------------
-------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------- CC:PT&E:B04
--------------------------- PLR-100842-25
Date:
------------------------------------------------------------ July 01, 2025


LEGEND

Decedent = ------------------------------------------------
Spouse = -----------------------------------------------------------
Child 1 = -----------------------
Child 2 = ---------------------
Child 3 = --------------------------
Attorney = --------------------
Law Firm = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accounting Firm = ----------------------------------
Date 1 = ------------------
Date 2 = ----------------------
Date 3 = ----------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Trust = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marital Trust = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
X = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Dear --------------:

This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated
December 20, 2024, and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time
under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and § 26.2642-7 of the

PLR-100842-25 2

Generation-Skipping Transfer (GST) Tax Regulations to allocate GST exemption to a
transfer to a trust.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

On Date 1, in Year 1 (a date prior to December 31, 2000), Decedent established Trust
for the benefit of Child 1, Child 2, Child 3, and the descendants of such children. Trust
has GST tax potential. On Date 2, in Year 1 (a date prior to December 31, 2000),
Decedent made a gift of X to Trust 1. On their Year 1 Forms 709 (United States Gift
(and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Returns), Decedent and Spouse elected to
treat Year 1 gifts as made one-half by each of them under § 2513 of the Code.

Decedent and Spouse retained Attorney and Law Firm to create Trust and to coordinate
with Accounting Firm regarding the Year 1 transfer of X to Trust. Decedent and Spouse
retained Accounting Firm to prepare Forms 709 to report the Year 1 transfer of X to
Trust. In preparing the Year 1 Forms 709, Accounting Firm failed to report the Year 1
transfer of X to Trust. Thus, Accounting Firm did not allocate Decedent’s and Spouse’s
respective GST exemptions to the transfer of X made in Year 1 to Trust.

Decedent died on Date 3 in Year 2. Prior to his death, Decedent executed a revocable
trust. Decedent’s revocable trust provides that upon Decedent’s death, Marital Trust is
to be created for the benefit of Spouse. The executor of Decedent’s estate (Executor)
retained Attorney to prepare Decedent’s Form 706, United States Gift (and Generation-
Skipping Transfer) Tax return. Executor elected to treat the assets of Marital Trust as
qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) so that the amount passing to Marital Trust
qualified for the marital deduction under § 2056(b)(7). Executor severed Marital Trust
into a GST exempt QTIP trust (GST Exempt Marital Trust) and a GST non-exempt QTIP
trust (Non-Exempt Marital Trust). Executor made a reverse QTIP election under
§ 2652(a)(3) with respect to the GST Exempt Marital Trust. On Form 706, Executor
affirmatively allocated the remainder of Decedent’s available GST exemption to the
GST Exempt Marital Trust.

In Year 3, Executor discovered that the transfer of X to Trust in Year 1 was not reported
on Decedent’s and Spouse’s Year 1 Forms 709. Consequently, Decedent and Spouse
did not allocate GST exemption to the Year 1 transfer of X to Trust.

Decedent’s estate requests an extension of time under § 2642(g) and § 26.2642-7 to
allocate Decedent’s GST exemption to the Year 1 transfer of X to Trust.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 2001(a) imposes a tax on the transfer of the taxable estate of every decedent
who is a citizen or resident of the United States.

PLR-100842-25 3

Section 2056(a) provides that, for purposes of the tax imposed by § 2001, the value of
the taxable estate is to be determined by deducting from the value of the gross estate
an amount equal to the value of any interest in property that passes or has passed from
the decedent to the surviving spouse.

Section 2056(b)(7)(A) provides that, in the case of qualified terminable interest property,
the entire property shall be treated as passing to the surviving spouse for purposes of
§ 2056(a), and no part of the property shall be treated as passing to any person other
than the surviving spouse for purposes of § 2056(b)(1)(A).

Section 2056(b)(7)(B)(i) defines “qualified terminable interest property” as property:
(1) which passes from the decedent, (2) in which the surviving spouse has a qualifying
income interest for life, and (3) to which an election under § 2056(b)(7)(B)(v) applies.

Section 2056(b)(7)(B)(v) provides that an election under § 2056(b)(7) with respect to
any property shall be made by the executor on the return of tax imposed by § 2001.
Such election, once made, shall be irrevocable.

Section 2513(a)(1) provides, generally, that, if the parties consent, a gift made by one
spouse to any person other than the donor's spouse shall, for gift tax purposes, be
considered as made one-half by the donor and one-half by the donor's spouse.

Section 2652(a)(2) provides that if, under § 2513, one-half of a gift is treated as made
by an individual and one-half of such gift is treated as made by the spouse of such
individual, such gift shall be so treated for purposes of chapter 13.

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation
skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as, (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable
termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2631(a), in effect at the time of the transfer, provides that, for purposes of
determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of
$1,000,000 which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property
with respect to which such individual is the transferor.

Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be
irrevocable.

Section 2632(a)(1) provides that an individual’s GST exemption may be allocated at any
time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual’s
estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such return is
required to be filed. Section 2632(a)(2) provides that allocations are to be made as
prescribed by forms or regulations issued by the Secretary.

PLR-100842-25 4

Section 26.2632-1(b)(4)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations
provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the
transferor’s lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.

Under § 26.2632-1(d)(1), an allocation of a decedent’s available GST exemption by the
executor of the decedent’s estate is made on Form 706 filed on or before the date
prescribed for filing the return by § 6075(a) (including any extensions granted). An
allocation of GST exemption with respect to property included in the gross estate of a
decedent is effective as of the date of death.

Section 2652(a)(3) provides that in the case of any trust with respect to which a
deduction is allowed to the decedent's estate under § 2056(b)(7), the estate of the
decedent may elect to treat all of the property in the trust, for purposes of chapter 13, as
if the election to be treated as QTIP had not been made. This election is referred to as
the reverse QTIP election. The consequence of a reverse QTIP election is that the
decedent remains, for GST tax purposes, the transferor of the QTIP trust for which the
election is made. As a result, the decedent's GST tax exemption may be allocated to
the QTIP trust.

Section 26.2652-2(a) provides that the election must be made with respect to all
property held in a QTIP trust. Section 26.2652-2(b) provides that a reverse QTIP
election is made on the return on which the QTIP election is made.

Section 2642(b)(1), as in effect at the time of the transfer, provides, in part, that, except
as provided under § 2642(f), if the allocation of the GST exemption to any property is
made on a gift tax return filed on or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b), (A) the
value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall be its value for purposes of
chapter 12 and (B) such allocation shall be effective on or after the date of such
transfer.

Section 2642(b)(2) provides generally that if property is transferred as a result of the
death of the transferor, the value of the property for purposes of determining the
inclusion ratio under § 2642(a)(1) shall be the value of the property as finally determined
for estate tax purposes.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such
circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make
an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under
§ 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
§ 2642(g).

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under this
paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including
evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such

PLR-100842-25 5

other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to
grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be
treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

Section 26.2642-7 of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations sets forth the
procedures for requesting an extension of time to make an allocation of GST exemption
described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5), and the
standards used to determine whether relief may be granted.

Section 26.2642-7(c) provides, in part, that the amount of GST exemption that may be
allocated to a transfer as the result of relief granted under this section in no event may
exceed the amount of the transferor's unused GST exemption under § 2631(c) as of the
date of the transfer.

Section 26.2642-7(d)(1) provides that requests for relief will be granted when and to the
extent that the transferor or the executor of the transferor’s estate provides evidence
establishing to the satisfaction of the IRS that the transferor or the executor of the
transferor’s estate acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the grant of relief will not
prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 26.2642-7(d)(2) provides a nonexclusive list of factors that will be considered in
determining whether the transferor or the executor of the transferor’s estate acted
reasonably and in good faith for purposes of § 26.2642-7, including reasonable reliance
by the transferor or the executor of the transferor’s estate on the advice of a qualified
tax professional.

Section 26.2642-7(e)(2)(i) provides, in part, that relief will not be granted to the extent
that it would decrease or revoke an affirmative (but not automatic) allocation of GST
exemption under § 2632(a) or 2642(b) that was made on a Federal gift or estate tax
return, regardless of whether the transfer or the allocation of exemption was made
during the transferor’s life or upon the transferor’s death.

Section 26.2642-7(e)(2)(ii) provides the three narrow exceptions to the rule that relief is
not available to decrease or revoke an affirmative allocation of GST exemption under
§ 2632(a) or § 2642(b): (A) an allocation of GST exemption is void to the extent that the
amount exceeds the amount needed to obtain an inclusion ratio of zero; (B) an
allocation is void if made to a trust, which at the time of allocation, has no GST potential;
and (C) a late allocation of GST exemption to a transfer or to a trust for certain transfers
made prior to December 31, 2000 is void to allow for relief to make a timely allocation of
GST exemption.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the requirements of § 26.2642-7 have not been satisfied. In general, § 2631(b)
provides that allocations of GST exemption are irrevocable once made. In addition,
§ 26.2642-7(e)(2)(i) provides, in part, that relief will not be granted to the extent that it

PLR-100842-25 6

would decrease or revoke an affirmative (but not automatic) allocation of GST
exemption under § 2632(a) or § 2642(b) that was made on a Federal gift or estate tax
return. Although § 26.2642-7(e)(2)(i) provides limited relief to decrease an affirmative
allocation, the facts must specifically fall within the three enumerated exceptions in
§ 26.2642-7(e)(2)(ii) to qualify for the limited relief.

Relief is not available to the Decedent’s estate under § 26.2642-7 as the estate’s
request for relief does not satisfy the § 26.2642-7(e)(2)(ii) exceptions permitting
changes to affirmative allocations of GST exemption. Granting relief to permit a
retroactive allocation of GST exemption to Decedent’s Year 1 lifetime transfer of X to
Trust would necessitate a decrease to the affirmative allocation the Decedent’s estate
made to Decedent’s GST Exempt Marital Trust on the estate tax return. The facts,
therefore, fall within the rule of § 26.2642-7(e)(2)(i), which prohibits relief when the relief
would decrease or revoke an affirmative allocation of GST exemption under § 2632(a)
or § 2642(b) that was made on a Federal gift or estate tax return.

Accordingly, we deny the estate’s request to retroactively allocate GST exemption to the
Year 1 transfer of X to Trust.

We neither express nor imply any opinion concerning the tax consequences of any
aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative

                                   Sincerely,

                                   Melissa C. Liquerman
                               By: _________________________
                                   Melissa C. Liquerman
                                   Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                   Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates)

Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes

PLR-100842-25 7

cc: --------------------------
------------------------
------------------------
---------------------------

cc: ---------------------
-----------------------
----------------------------------
---------------------------

cc: ------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.