Controlled entities received more time for tax-exempt-use property elections
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Two companies wholly owned by a tax-exempt entity served as general partners in partnerships that placed projects in service. Their partnership agreements stated that the companies would elect under IRC § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) not to be treated as tax-exempt entities, but their tax adviser inadvertently omitted the election statements from timely filed returns. Later returns were prepared on the assumption that valid elections had been made. The companies requested regulatory relief and represented that they had reasonably relied on the adviser and that relief would not prejudice the government. The IRS granted 60 days to file the required election statements and directed that the ruling be attached to relevant returns.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could two tax-exempt controlled entities receive additional time to elect not to be treated as tax-exempt entities under the depreciation rules?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 167 and 168(h)(6)(F); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3, and 301.9100-7T
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202530001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/25/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------- -------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------------ Telephone Number:
--------------------------------- ---------------------
----------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B07
PLR-101571-25
Date:
April 24, 2025
Re: ---------------------------------------------------------
Request for Extension of Time to Make the Election Not to be Treated as a Tax-
Exempt Controlled Entity
Legend
A = ---------------------------------------------------------
B = ------------------------------------------------
Date1 = -------------------------
Taxable Year 1 = --------------------------------------------------
Taxable Year 2 = ----------------------------------------------------------
State Z = -------------
Date2 = ---------
Date3 = -----------
X = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Tax-exempt = ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entity
Advisor = ----------------------------------
Partnership N = -------------------------------------------------------------
Partnership Q = ---------------------------------
PLR-101571-25 2
Dear ----------------:
This letter ruling responds to a letter dated Date1, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted by A and B. A and B request an extension of time pursuant
to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to
make the election under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for,
respectively, Taxable Year 1, and Taxable Year 2. Hereinafter, A and B will be
collectively referred to as “Taxpayer”.
This letter ruling is being issued electronically in accordance with section 7.02(5)
of Rev. Proc. 2024-1, 2024-1 I.R.B. 1, 34.
FACTS
Taxpayer represents the facts are as follows:
Taxpayer is a limited liability company, treated as a corporation for federal
income tax purposes, and formed under the laws of State Z. A uses the accrual
method as its overall accounting method and its annual accounting period runs from
Date2 to Date3. B uses the accrual method as its overall method of accounting and
the calendar year as its annual accounting period. Taxpayer is engaged in the
business of X. Tax-exempt Entity wholly owns Taxpayer. Taxpayer represents that
it is therefore a tax-exempt controlled entity within the meaning of § 168(h)(6)(F)(iii).
A is the managing general partner of Partnership N. B is the general partner of
Partnership Q. Partnership N placed in service a project in Taxable Year 1.
Partnership Q placed in service a project in Taxable Year 2. The respective partnership
agreements for Partnership N and Partnership Q stated:
No portion of the project is or will be treated as “tax exempt use property” as
defined in Section 168(h) of the Code. The administrative general partner will
make the election permitted under Section 168(h)(6)(F) of the Code.
A and B engaged Advisor to prepare their Taxable Year 1 and Taxable Year 2
federal income tax returns (collectively, the “Tax Returns”), respectively, and Advisor
was aware that Taxpayer intended to make an election under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) for
Taxable Year 1 and Taxable Year 2. Advisor prepared and timely filed Taxpayer’s Tax
Returns and inadvertently excluded the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) elections.
After Taxpayer’s Tax Returns were filed, a limited partner of Partnership N and a
limited partner of Partnership Q requested supporting documentation regarding
Taxpayer’s elections under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) on the Tax Returns, respectively. In
preparing the responses, Advisor discovered that Advisor inadvertently failed to file the
§ 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) elections by the due date (including extensions) for Taxpayer’s Tax
Returns. Further, Advisor informed A and B that their federal income tax returns for
taxable years subsequent to Taxable Year 1 and Taxable Year 2, respectively, were
PLR-101571-25 3
prepared presuming that valid § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) elections were filed for the Tax Returns.
Advisor communicated its error to Taxpayer. As a result, Taxpayer submitted its
letter dated Date1, requesting this letter ruling.
Finally, Taxpayer represents that, in requesting this letter ruling, it acted
reasonably and in good faith because Taxpayer reasonably relied on the expertise of
Advisor, and that granting an extension of time to make the election under
§ 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
RULING REQUESTED
A and B request that the Internal Revenue Service grant it an extension of time
under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to file the election under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) for
Taxable Year 1 and Taxable Year 2, respectively.
LAW
Section 167(a) provides that there shall be allowed as a depreciation deduction
a reasonable allowance for the exhaustion, wear and tear, and obsolescence of
property used in the trade or business, or in the production of income. The
depreciation deduction provided by § 167(a) for tangible property placed in service
after 1986 is generally determined under § 168. Under § 168(g)(1)(B), the alternative
depreciation system must be used for any tax-exempt use property as defined in
§ 168(h).
Section 168(h)(6)(A) provides that, for purposes of § 168(h), if any property
which is not tax-exempt use property is owned by a partnership having both a tax-
exempt entity and a non-tax-exempt entity as partners and any allocation to the tax-
exempt entity is not a qualified allocation, then an amount equal to such tax-exempt
entity’s proportionate share of such property is treated as tax-exempt use property.
Section 168(h)(6)(F)(i) provides that, in general, any tax-exempt controlled entity
is treated as a tax-exempt entity for purposes of § 168(h)(5) and (6). Under
§ 168(h)(6)(F)(iii)(I), a corporation (without regard to that subparagraph and
§ 168(h)(2)(E)) constitutes a “tax-exempt controlled entity” if 50-percent or more (in
value) of the corporation’s stock is held by one or more tax-exempt entities (other than
a foreign person or entity).
Under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii), a tax-exempt controlled entity can elect not to be treated
as a tax-exempt entity. Once made, the election is irrevocable and will bind all tax-
exempt entities holding an interest in the tax-exempt controlled entity. Under
§ 301.9100-7T(a)(1), a § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election must be made in accordance with the
rules provided in §§ 301.9100-7T(a)(2) and (3).
Under § 301.9100-7T(a)(2)(i), a § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election must be made by the
PLR-101571-25 4
due date of the tax return for the first taxable year for which the election is to be
effective. Section 301.9100-7T(a)(3)(i) provides that the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election
must be made by attaching a statement to the tax return for the taxable year in which
the election is to be effective.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the
Commissioner) has the discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules
set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a
regulatory election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for
making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election as one whose due date is
prescribed by regulations in the Federal Register, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure,
notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Because the due
date of the election is prescribed by § 301.9100-7T(a)(2)(i), the requested
§ 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election is a regulatory election.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3
will be granted when a taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the
granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts as represented and the applicable law, we conclude
that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. A and B
are granted an extension of 60 calendar days from the date of this letter ruling to file
the election statement with the appropriate service center containing the information
required by § 301.9100-7T(a)(3) for the elections to be effective in, respectively,
Taxable Year 1 and Taxable Year 2.
Taxpayer must attach a copy of this letter ruling to the election statements.
Further, this letter ruling should be attached to all subsequent returns (and amended
returns) for all taxable years to which this letter ruling is relevant. If A or B files its
amended return electronically, it may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement
to its amended return that provides the date and control number of this letter ruling.
Pursuant to § 301.9100-7T(a)(3)(ii), a copy of this letter ruling and the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii)
election statement also should be attached to the Federal income tax returns of each of
the tax-exempt shareholders or beneficiaries of Taxpayer.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
PLR-101571-25 5
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of
the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling, it is subject to verification on
examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the
instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations
that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the
time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction.
Pursuant to the Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of
Representative, on file, we are sending a copy of this letter to Taxpayer’s authorized
representatives. We are also sending a copy of this letter ruling to the appropriate
Service operating division official.
Sincerely,
Amy S. Wei
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 7
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
cc: ------------------------------
----------------------------------
--------------------------
---------------------------------------
-------------------------
----------------------------------
--------------------------
---------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
--
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.