🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202528011 Released July 11, 2025 Approved

Partnership received more time to opt out of bonus depreciation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership placed qualified five-year and fifteen-year property in service and claimed additional first-year depreciation on its timely return. Its return preparer did not know that the deduction would create unfavorable state tax consequences for partners and therefore did not advise the partnership to elect out under IRC § 168(k)(7). The issue was discovered after the return was filed. Based on the submitted facts and representations, the IRS found that the requirements for regulatory relief were met. It granted 60 days to make the election for both property classes through an administrative adjustment request or the appropriate Form 8082 filing.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the partnership make a late election not to claim bonus depreciation for qualified five-year and fifteen-year property?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 168(k)(7); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-2(f) and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202528011 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/11/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------- -------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------- ---------------------
----------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B07
PLR-122054-24
Date:
April 15, 2025

Re: Request for Extension of Time to Make the § 168(k)(7) Election
----------------------------------
-------------------------

Legend

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------
Firm = ------------------------
Taxable Year = ------------------------------------------------------
State = --------------
Date1 = ---------------------
Date2 = -----------------------
Date3 = ----------------------
X = -----------------------------------------------------------

Dear ------------:

   This letter responds to a letter dated November 13, 2024, and subsequent

correspondence, submitted by your representative on behalf of Taxpayer. In that letter,
Taxpayer requests the consent of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(Commissioner) to grant an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-
3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the 168(k)(7) election not to
deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code) for all classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer during
the Taxable Year.

PLR-122054-24 2

                                      FACTS

   Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

    Taxpayer is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and files a

Form 1065, U.S. Income Tax Return for Partnership Income, on a calendar year basis.
Taxpayer's overall method of accounting is the accrual method. Taxpayer is part of a
multi-tiered partnership, Taxpayer is engaged in the business of X.

   During the Taxable Year, Taxpayer placed in service property that is classified as

5-year property or 15-year property that is qualified property under § 168(k)(2)
(collectively, the classes of property). On its timely filed federal tax return for the
Taxable Year, on extension, Taxpayer deducted the additional first year depreciation for
the assets in the classes of property.

     On Date1, Taxpayer engaged Firm to prepare its federal income tax return for

the Taxable Year (the federal return). Taxpayer reviewed the federal return prior to its
filing. At that time, Taxpayer was not aware that Taxpayer’s deduction of the additional
first year depreciation on the federal return would result in certain unfavorable State tax
implications to one or more partners of Taxpayer. Additionally, Firm did not advise the
individual partners of the upper-tier partnerships, and the engagement team has no
visibility of those individual partners’ information. As a result, Firm did not advise
Taxpayer to make the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation for the
classes of property placed in service during the Taxable Year.

   On Date2, before the extended due date, Firm electronically filed the federal

return for Taxpayer. On Date3, after Firm filed Taxpayer’s return, Taxpayer’s
accountant notified Firm that one or more of its partners reported unfavorable state tax
implications as a result of the first year additional depreciation deductions reported on
the federal return.

                             RULING REQUESTED

   Accordingly, Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1

and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election
under § 168(k)(7) not to deduct the additional first year depreciation for the classes of
property that are qualified property under § 168(k) and placed in service by Taxpayer
during the Taxable Year.

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Sections 168(k)(1) and (6) allow, in the taxable year that qualified property is

placed in service, an additional first year depreciation deduction equal to the applicable
percentage of the adjusted basis of qualified property placed in service by the Taxpayer
after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023 (or before January 1, 2024 for
qualified property described in § 168(k)(2)(B) or (C)).

PLR-122054-24 3

    Section 168(k)(7) provides that a taxpayer may make an election not to deduct

the additional first year depreciation for any class of property that is qualified property
placed in service during the taxable year (the § 168(k)(7) election). Section 1.168(k)-
2(f)(1)(i) provides that the § 168(k)(7) election applies to all qualified property that is in
the same class of property and placed in service in the same taxable year. Section
1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(ii) defines "class of property" for purposes of the § 168(k)(7) election as
meaning each class of property described in § 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(ii)(A)-(G).

   Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(A) provides that the § 168(k)(7) election not to deduct

additional first year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of
the federal tax return for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service by
the taxpayer.

   Section 1.168(k)-2(f)(1)(iii)(B) provides that the § 168(k)(7) election not to deduct

additional first year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562,
"Depreciation and Amortization," and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for
the Taxable Year provide that the election not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation is made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer's timely filed tax return
indicating that the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
and the class of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.

   Under § 301.9100-1, the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable

extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides an extension of time for making elections that
do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

                                   CONCLUSION

    Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted an extension of 60 calendar days from the date of this letter ruling
to make the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k)
for the classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer during the Taxable
Year. This election must be made pursuant to a request for an administrative
adjustment (see § 6227) in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center

PLR-122054-24 4

accompanying Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR), or Form 8082, Notice of
Inconsistent Treatment or AAR, and for any related filings as instructed in Form 8082,
as appropriate.

   Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the

federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provisions of
the Code (including other subsections of § 168). Specifically, no opinion is expressed
or implied on whether any item of depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer
during the Taxable Year is eligible for the additional first year depreciation deduction
under § 168(k).

  This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

  In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a

copy of this letter ruling to Taxpayer's authorized representative. We are also sending a
copy of this letter ruling to the appropriate IRS operating division official.

                                           Sincerely,

                                           --------------------------

                                           Elizabeth R. Binder
                                           Senior Counsel, Branch 7
                                           Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                           (Income Tax & Accounting)

cc: -------------------------
-------------------------
---------------------------------------------
------------------------

  ----------------------
  ------------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.