🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Private Letter Ruling 202527003 Released July 3, 2025 Approved

Ineffective S election treated as valid until QSub reorganization

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2025, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An LLC's S corporation election was ineffective for two independent reasons: spouses with community-property interests did not provide all required shareholder consents, and the operating agreement inadvertently created a second class of stock. The LLC, its later corporate parent, and their shareholders consistently treated the entities as S corporations and represented that the errors were inadvertent rather than tax-motivated. The IRS treated the LLC as an S corporation from the intended election date until it became a qualified subchapter S subsidiary in a later reorganization. The relief required every omitted current or former spouse to file a written consent associated with the original Form 2553 within 120 days.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could an S election lacking community-property consents and impaired by a second class of stock be treated as effective until the corporation became a QSub?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(1), 1362(a)(2), and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1361-1(l) and 1.1362-6

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202527003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/3/2025 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.00-00, 1362.01-00,
1362.01-02, 1362.02-00, Person To Contact:
1362.02-02, 1362.04-00 ----------------------------, ID No. --------------
-----------------
------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------- ---------------------
----------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------- CC:PSI:01
------- --------------------- PLR-102593-25
Date:
April 08, 2025

LEGEND

X = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Y = -------------------------

State 1 = -------------

State 2 = -------------

Date 1 = ------------------

Date 2 = ---------------------

Date 3 = -----------------------

Date 4 = -----------------------

Date 5 = -----------------------

Dear ---------------:

  This letter responds to a letter dated January 29, 2025, and subsequent

correspondence, submitted on behalf of X and Y by its authorized representative,

PLR-102593-25 2

requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

                                     FACTS

    The information submitted states that X is a limited liability company formed

under the laws of State 1 on Date 1. Effective Date 2, X filed Form 2553, Election by a
Small Business Corporation, for X to be treated as an S corporation. However, X
represents that it did not obtain all of the shareholder consents required by § 1.1362-6
of the Income Tax Regulations, resulting in an ineffective election. Specifically, some
spouses of X's shareholders located in community property states at the time of the
election failed to properly consent to X’s S corporation election. In addition, X’s
operating agreement, effective Date 1, which continued in effect through Date 2,
included provisions relevant to treating X as a partnership for federal income tax
purposes. X represents that certain provisions of its operating agreement inadvertently
created a second class of stock, which is an independent reason that its S election was
ineffective.

   On Date 3, incident to what was intended to qualify as a reorganization under

§ 368(a)(1)(F), X’s shareholders contributed all of their stock in X to Y, a corporation
organized under the laws of State 2. Effectively immediately afterwards, Y made an
election to treat X as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub). Following the
reorganization, on Date 4, X made an election under § 301.7701-3(c) to be disregarded
as an entity separate from its owner Y. On Date 5, Y sold X to an unrelated party.

   X and Y represent that the invalid S election was inadvertent and was not

motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning, and that X and Y and its
shareholders consistently treated X and Y as being an S corporation from Date 2
through Date 3. Further, X and Y and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments
required as a condition of obtaining relief for the invalidity of X's election as provided
under § 1362(f) that may be required by the Secretary.

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 1362(a) of the Code provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a

small business corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be
an S corporation.

  Section 1361(a)(1) defines an “S corporation” as a small business corporation for

which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for the taxable year.

    Section 1362(a)(2) provides that an election to be an S corporation shall be valid

only if all persons who are shareholders in such corporation on the day on which such
election is made consent to such election.

PLR-102593-25 3

   Section 1.1362-6(a)(2)(i) provides that the election to be an S corporation is not

valid unless all shareholders of the corporation at the time of the election consent to the
election in the manner provided in § 1.1362-6(b).

  Section 1.1362-6(b)(2)(i) provides that when stock of the corporation is owned by

spouses as community property (or the income from the stock is community property),
each person having a community interest in the stock or income therefrom must
consent to the election.

  Section 1361(b)(1) provides that a small business corporation means a domestic

corporation which is not an ineligible corporation for such year and which does not,
among other limitations, have more than one class of stock.

   Section 1.1361-1(l)(1) provides, in part, that a corporation is generally treated as

having only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock of the corporation confer
identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds.

   Section 1.1361-1(1)(2)(i) provides that the determination of whether all

outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation
proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws,
applicable state laws, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation
proceeds (collectively, governing provisions).

   Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be

terminated whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for
which a corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B) provides that the termination shall be effective on
and after the date of cessation.

    Section 1362(f) provides, in pertinent part, that if (1) an election under

§ 1362(a) by any corporation was not effective for the taxable year for which made
(determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)), by reason of a failure to meet the
requirements of § 1361(b), or terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary
determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were
inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the event
resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the
corporation for which the election was made or the termination occurred is a small
business corporation, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder
of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees
to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S
corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then,
notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, the
corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the
Secretary.

PLR-102593-25 4

                                 CONCLUSION

    Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we first conclude

that X's S corporation election was ineffective because the required shareholder
consents to the election were not obtained, and because of the provisions contained in
X’s operating agreement. However, we also conclude that the ineffectiveness of X's S
corporation election was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Pursuant to the
provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from Date 2 through
Date 3, when X became a QSub, provided X's S corporation election was otherwise
effective and not terminated under § 1362(d).

   As a condition to this ruling, any current or former spouse of a current or former

shareholder required by § 1.1362-6 to sign X's Form 2553 that did not do so must sign a
written statement as described in § 1.1362-6(b)(1) consenting to X’s S corporation
election effective Date 2. The written statement(s) must be filed with the appropriate
service center within 120 days from the date of this letter, indicating that the
statement(s) are to be associated with X’s originally filed Form 2553.

    Except as specifically ruled above, we express or imply no opinion concerning

the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding whether X was otherwise
eligible to be an S corporation or whether the transactions on Date 3 qualified as an F
reorganization within the meaning of § 368(a)(1)(F).

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. According to

§ 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

   The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

    Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of

this letter to your authorized representative.

                                  Sincerely,


                                  ______/S/_________________
                                  Laura C. Fields
                                  Branch Chief, Branch 1
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

PLR-102593-25 5

Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc: -----------------
--------------------------
--------------------
-------------------------
----------------------------

 ----------------------------------
 -----------------------------------
 ------------------------

 ----------------------------------
 -----------------------------------------
 -----------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2025, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.